Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 9 Apr 2024 09:22:14 +0200 | From | Maxime Chevallier <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next v11 00/13] Introduce PHY listing and link_topology tracking |
| |
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 01:50:54 +0200 Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:
> > > Here is the summary with links: > > > - [net-next,v11,01/13] net: phy: Introduce ethernet link topology representation > > > https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/6916e461e793 > > > - [net-next,v11,02/13] net: sfp: pass the phy_device when disconnecting an sfp module's PHY > > > https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/0ec5ed6c130e > > > - [net-next,v11,03/13] net: phy: add helpers to handle sfp phy connect/disconnect > > > https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/e75e4e074c44 > > > - [net-next,v11,04/13] net: sfp: Add helper to return the SFP bus name > > > https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/fdd353965b52 > > > - [net-next,v11,05/13] net: ethtool: Allow passing a phy index for some commands > > > https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/841942bc6212 > > > - [net-next,v11,06/13] netlink: specs: add phy-index as a header parameter > > > (no matching commit) > > > - [net-next,v11,07/13] net: ethtool: Introduce a command to list PHYs on an interface > > > (no matching commit) > > > - [net-next,v11,08/13] netlink: specs: add ethnl PHY_GET command set > > > (no matching commit) > > > - [net-next,v11,09/13] net: ethtool: plca: Target the command to the requested PHY > > > (no matching commit) > > > - [net-next,v11,10/13] net: ethtool: pse-pd: Target the command to the requested PHY > > > (no matching commit) > > > - [net-next,v11,11/13] net: ethtool: cable-test: Target the command to the requested PHY > > > (no matching commit) > > > - [net-next,v11,12/13] net: ethtool: strset: Allow querying phy stats by index > > > (no matching commit) > > > - [net-next,v11,13/13] Documentation: networking: document phy_link_topology > > > (no matching commit) > > > > It looks like commits 6 to 13 didn't make it upstream with (the "no > > matching commit" messages above). Is that expected ? > > They are not in net-next, unlike 1-5. > > You probably need to repost them.
I'll repost indeed.
Thanks Andrew BTW for all the reviews !
Maxime
| |