lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86/purgatory: Switch to the position-independent small code model
From
Hi,

On 29. 04. 24, 14:05, Michael Matz wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2024, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
>> Interesting. I thought gcc doesn't have problems here yet and was
>> talking to Matz on Thu about it and it seems he's forgotten about his
>> statement too that "you should simply stop using -mcmodel=large. Noone
>> should use it." :-)
>
> It may be so ingrained in my brain that I'm not _always_ saying it when
> talking about the large code model over a beer. And indeed I know of no
> particular problems with it vis GCC,

Of course you do :). That bsc#1211853 I linked earlier. I.e. gcc-13 +
-fstrict-flex-arrays=3 + -mcmodel=large + some asm() expecting __FILE__
to be constant (not true with the large model).

regards,
--
js
suse labs


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-27 18:08    [W:0.077 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site