Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 5 Feb 2024 15:40:56 -1000 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH-wq v3 0/4] workqueue: Enable unbound cpumask update on ordered workqueues |
| |
On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 08:24:06PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > > On 2/5/24 19:04, Tejun Heo wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 09:53:09AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 02:45:58PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > > > > v3: > > > > - [v2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240203154334.791910-1-longman@redhat.com/ > > > > - Drop patch 1 as it has been merged into the for-6.9 branch. > > > > - Use rcu_access_pointer() to access wq->dfl_pwq. > > > > - Use RCU protection instead of acquiring wq->mutex in > > > > apply_wqattrs_cleanup(). > > > Looks like we raced each other. I'll wait for v4. > > BTW, please don't bother to handle __WQ_ORDERED being cleared. We are very > > close to removing the implicit ORDERED promotion, so we should be able to > > apply the patch to remove the distinction between explicitly and implicitly > > ordered workqueues. > > BTW, the workqueue.c file in your latest for-6.9 branch still has a > reference to __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT in workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask(). > Will that break compilation?
Right you are. Will post a followup patch.
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |