lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 8/9] media: dt-bindings: Add Intel Displayport RX IP
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 02:11:27PM +0100, Paweł Anikiel wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 6:29 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 26/02/2024 13:43, Paweł Anikiel wrote:
> > >>>>> + intel,max-stream-count:
> > >>>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > >>>>> + description: Max stream count configuration parameter
> > >>>>> +
> > >>>>> + port:
> > >>>>> + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
> > >>>>> + description: SST main link
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I don't understand why you have both port and ports. Shouldn't this be
> > >>>> under ports?
> > >>>
> > >>> I put both so that you can use the shorter port property when the
> > >>> device only has one port (i.e. no MST support). It would work fine
> > >>> without it. If you think that's unnecessary, I can remove it (and use
> > >>> the ports property even if there is only one).
> > >>
> > >> No, it is fine, but then you need allOf: which will restrict to only one
> > >> of them: either port or ports.
> > >
> > > There already is an allOf below that says that ports is required for
> > > MST support and port is required otherwise. Isn't this enough?
> >
> > Add both port and ports and see if it is enough.
>
> Ok, I see. I tried and this seems to work:
>
> oneOf:
> - required:
> - port
> - required:
> - ports
>
> And that would make the if/else with port and ports below not needed.
> What do you think?

Just always use 'ports' rather than complicate things.

Rob

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-27 15:24    [W:0.128 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site