Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 27 Feb 2024 11:10:25 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: fpga: xlnx,fpga-selectmap: add DT schema | From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <> |
| |
On 21/02/2024 20:50, Charles Perry wrote: > Document the SelectMAP interface of Xilinx 7 series FPGA. > > Signed-off-by: Charles Perry <charles.perry@savoirfairelinux.com> > --- > .../bindings/fpga/xlnx,fpga-selectmap.yaml | 86 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/xlnx,fpga-selectmap.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/xlnx,fpga-selectmap.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/xlnx,fpga-selectmap.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000000..08a5e92781657 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/xlnx,fpga-selectmap.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/fpga/xlnx,fpga-selectmap.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: Xilinx SelectMAP FPGA interface > + > +maintainers: > + - Charles Perry <charles.perry@savoirfairelinux.com> > + > +description: | > + Xilinx 7 Series FPGAs support a method of loading the bitstream over a > + parallel port named the SelectMAP interface in the documentation. Only > + the x8 mode is supported where data is loaded at one byte per rising edge of > + the clock, with the MSB of each byte presented to the D0 pin. > + > + Datasheets: > + https://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/user_guides/ug470_7Series_Config.pdf > + > +allOf: > + - $ref: /schemas/memory-controllers/mc-peripheral-props.yaml# > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + enum: > + - xlnx,fpga-xc7s-selectmap > + - xlnx,fpga-xc7a-selectmap > + - xlnx,fpga-xc7k-selectmap > + - xlnx,fpga-xc7v-selectmap > + > + reg: > + description: > + At least 1 byte of memory mapped IO > + maxItems: 1 > + > + prog_b-gpios:
I commented on this and still see underscore. Nothing in commit msg explains why this should have underscore. Changelog is also vague - describes that you brought back underscores, instead of explaining why you did it.
So the same comments as usual:
No underscores in names.
Best regards, Krzysztof
| |