Messages in this thread | | | From | Allen <> | Date | Mon, 26 Feb 2024 09:30:14 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCHSET wq/for-6.9,6.10] workqueue: Implement disable/enable_work() |
| |
> > > > For 0001-00010: > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> > > > > > > Applied 0001-0010 to wq/for-6.9. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > I have rebased the conversion work based on > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq.git disable_work-v1 > > > > 0001-dma-Convert-from-tasklet-to-BH-workqueue.patch > > 0002-IB-Convert-from-tasklet-to-BH-workqueue.patch > > 0003-USB-Convert-from-tasklet-to-BH-workqueue.patch > > 0004-mailbox-Convert-from-tasklet-to-BH-workqueue.patch > > 0005-ipmi-Convert-from-tasklet-to-BH-workqueue.patch > > 0006-s390-Convert-from-tasklet-to-BH-workqueue.patch > > 0007-drivers-media-Convert-from-tasklet-to-BH-workqueue.patch > > 0008-mmc-Convert-from-tasklet-to-BH-workqueue.patch > > > > Patches: https://github.com/allenpais/for-6.9-bh-conversions > > KSPP Issue: refactor all tasklet users into other APIs · Issue #94 · > > https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/94 > >
Kees,
> > I am working on drivers/crypto/* and drivers/net/*. This might a > > day or two more. Please provide guidance on the types of testing I > > should perform. > > Great! What's the plan for these? Will they go to subsystem maintainers > after the next merge window, or is Tejun carrying them? >
I think it's best to send it out the subsystem mailing list. Ideally, get some testing/benchmarks run and then look at getting them into either Tejun's branch or via subsystem maintainers. I am open to other ideas.
Thanks.
> -Kees > > -- > Kees Cook
-- - Allen
| |