Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 21 Feb 2024 16:52:26 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable zram, xfs and loading compressed FW support | From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <> |
| |
On 21/02/2024 16:49, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 04:39:18PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 21/02/2024 16:31, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024, at 13:59, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >>>> These options are needed by some Linux distributions (e.g: Fedora), so >>>> let's enable them to make it easier for developers using such distros. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com> >>>> --- >>> >>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >>> >>>> @@ -1595,6 +1599,7 @@ CONFIG_HTE_TEGRA194_TEST=m >>>> CONFIG_EXT2_FS=y >>>> CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y >>>> CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL=y >>>> +CONFIG_XFS_FS=m >>>> CONFIG_BTRFS_FS=m >>>> CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y >>> >>> Unfortunately this will increase build time noticeably, but >>> I agree it is the right thing to do. >>> >>> Can you send it (with any other acks) to soc@kernel.org so >>> I can merge it from there? >> >> Due to XFS, please include: >> >> Nacked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> >> >> so this will not be precedence used for further patches like this >> (Maxime already used such argument, so I want to be sure it will not be >> used against me in the future) > > For the record, I didn't use anything against *you*. I'd just like > consistency over how defconfig rules are applied.
True, apologies if it seemed to harsh. I meant the discussion, so maybe better: "Maxime used such argument with discussion with me, so I want to be sure there is no silent ack from me in the future."
Best regards, Krzysztof
| |