lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable zram, xfs and loading compressed FW support
From
On 21/02/2024 16:49, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 04:39:18PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 21/02/2024 16:31, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024, at 13:59, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>>> These options are needed by some Linux distributions (e.g: Fedora), so
>>>> let's enable them to make it easier for developers using such distros.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>>
>>>> @@ -1595,6 +1599,7 @@ CONFIG_HTE_TEGRA194_TEST=m
>>>> CONFIG_EXT2_FS=y
>>>> CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y
>>>> CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
>>>> +CONFIG_XFS_FS=m
>>>> CONFIG_BTRFS_FS=m
>>>> CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
>>>
>>> Unfortunately this will increase build time noticeably, but
>>> I agree it is the right thing to do.
>>>
>>> Can you send it (with any other acks) to soc@kernel.org so
>>> I can merge it from there?
>>
>> Due to XFS, please include:
>>
>> Nacked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>
>> so this will not be precedence used for further patches like this
>> (Maxime already used such argument, so I want to be sure it will not be
>> used against me in the future)
>
> For the record, I didn't use anything against *you*. I'd just like
> consistency over how defconfig rules are applied.

True, apologies if it seemed to harsh. I meant the discussion, so maybe
better:
"Maxime used such argument with discussion with me, so I want to be sure
there is no silent ack from me in the future."

Best regards,
Krzysztof


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-27 15:14    [W:1.434 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site