Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 2 Feb 2024 16:47:17 +0000 | From | Conor Dooley <> | Subject | Re: 回复: 回复: [v2 ] riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110: Add camera subsystem nodes |
| |
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 02:29:16AM +0000, Changhuang Liang wrote: > > Hi, Conor, > > [...] > > > > > + imx219_clk: imx219-clock { > > > > > + compatible = "fixed-clock"; > > > > > + clock-output-names = "imx219_clk"; > > > > > + clock-frequency = <24000000>; > > > > > + #clock-cells = <0>; > > > > > + }; > > > > > > > > Why do you need an output name here? > > > > > > The output name can be unnecessary. > > > > > > > Also, where does this clock come from? Is it an oscillator on the board? > > > > > > > > > > This clock come from imx219, not the VisionFive 2 board. > > > > If the camera is not on the visionfive 2 board, why are you adding this to > > visionfive-2.dtsi? > > It seems that I need to use dtso. Right?
Yes. FWIW, the same comments as applied for the sound card Walker tried to add applies here too, unless this ships with the boards: | I'm not against allowing in-tree overlays for hats/capes/daughter-boards | that come bundled with a board, but accepting ones for a hat that | someone decided to use theoretically has no limit! The "someone" in this | case might be a StarFive developer, but it could be any random one of | your customers next! https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230510-riveter-ridden-3f056251e623@spud/
I figure this is a similar case as that? [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |