Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 2 Feb 2024 20:46:56 +0100 | From | Michal Koutný <> | Subject | Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcg: Use larger chunks for proactive reclaim |
| |
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 10:22:34AM -0800, "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@google.com> wrote: > So all of these should be more or less equivalent: > delta <= SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX ? delta : (delta + 3*SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) / 4 > max((nr_to_reclaim - nr_reclaimed) / 4, (nr_to_reclaim - nr_reclaimed) % 4) > (nr_to_reclaim - nr_reclaimed) / 4 + 4 > (nr_to_reclaim - nr_reclaimed) / 4 > > I was just trying to avoid putting in a 0 for the request size with the mod.
The third variant would be simpler then. Modulo looks weird.
Oh, and I just realized that try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages() does max(nr_pages, SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX). Then I'd vote for the fourth variant + possible comment about harmless 0. (I'm sorry if this was discussed before.)
Michal [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |