Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] dm-raid: fix v6.7 regressions | From | Yu Kuai <> | Date | Wed, 31 Jan 2024 15:06:22 +0800 |
| |
Hi,
在 2024/01/31 10:52, Yu Kuai 写道: > Hi, > > 在 2024/01/31 9:28, Xiao Ni 写道: >> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 9:25 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, Xiao Ni! >>> >>> 在 2024/01/31 8:29, Xiao Ni 写道: >>>> In my environment, the lvm2 regression test has passed. There are only >>>> three failed cases which also fail in kernel 6.6. >>>> >>>> ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/lvresize-fs-crypt.sh >>>> ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/pvck-dump.sh >>>> ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/select-report.sh >>>> ### 426 tests: 346 passed, 70 skipped, 0 timed out, 7 warned, 3 failed >>>> in 89:26.073 >>> >>> Thanks for the test, this is greate news. >>> >>> Kuai >>> >> >> Hi Kuai >> >> Have you run mdadm regression tests based on this patch set?
BTW, I just make sure there are no new failed tests, however, there looks like some tests are broken. For example:
04update-metadata:
++ /root/mdadm/mdadm --quiet -CR --assume-clean -e 0.90 /dev/md0 --level linear -n 4 -c 64 /dev/loop0 /dev/loop1 /dev/loop2 /dev/loop3 --auto=yes ++ rv=1 ++ case $* in ++ cat /var/tmp/stderr mdadm: RUN_ARRAY failed: Invalid argument
04r1update:
++ /root/mdadm/mdadm --quiet -A /dev/md0 -U resync /dev/loop0 /dev/loop1 ++ rv=1 ++ case $* in ++ cat /var/tmp/stderr mdadm: --update=resync not understood for 1.x metadata
Thanks, Kuai
> > Of course, I'm runing in my VM with loop devices. > > Thanks, > Kuai > >> >> Regards >> Xiao >> >> . >> > > . >
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |