lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] scsi: ata: Fix a race condition between scsi error handler and ahci interrupt
From


在 2023/8/22 18:30, Niklas Cassel 写道:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 05:20:33PM +0800, Li Nan wrote:
>> Thanks for your reply, Niklas.
>>
>> 在 2023/8/21 21:51, Niklas Cassel 写道:
>>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 09:48:48AM +0800, linan666@huaweicloud.com wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>>
>>> Hello Li Nan,
>>>
>>> I do not understand why the code in:
>>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.5-rc7/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c#L722-L731
>>>
>>> does not kick in, and repeats EH.
>>>
>>>
>>> EH_PENDING is cleared before ->error_handler() is called:
>>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.5-rc7/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c#L697
>>>
>>> So ahci_error_intr() from the second error interrupt, which is called after
>>> thawing the port, should have called ata_std_sched_eh(), which calls
>>> ata_eh_set_pending(), which should have set EH_PENDING:
>>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.5-rc7/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c#L884
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> My only guess is that after thawing the port:
>>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.5-rc7/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c#L2807
>>>
>>> The second error irq comes, and sets EH_PENDING,
>>> but then this silly code might clear it:
>>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.5-rc7/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c#L2825-L2837
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, I think so.
>>
>>> I think the best way would be if we could improve this "spurious error
>>> condition check"... because if this is indeed the code that clears EH_PENDING
>>> for you, then this code basically makes the "goto repeat" code in
>>> ata_scsi_port_error_handler() useless...
>>>
>>>
>>> An alternative to improving the "spurious error condition check" might be for
>>> you to try something like:
>>>
>>
>> We have used this solution before, but it will case WARN_ON in
>> ata_eh_finish() as below:
>>
>> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 118 at ../drivers/ata/libata-eh.c:4016
>> ata_eh_finish+0x15a/0x170
>
> Ok.
>
> How about if you simply move the WARN_ON to ata_scsi_port_error_handler()
> as well:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> index 35e03679b0bf..5be2fc651131 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> @@ -741,6 +741,12 @@ void ata_scsi_port_error_handler(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct ata_port *ap)
> */
> ap->ops->end_eh(ap);
>
> + if (!ap->scsi_host->host_eh_scheduled) {
> + /* make sure nr_active_links is zero after EH */
> + WARN_ON(ap->nr_active_links);
> + ap->nr_active_links = 0;
> + }
> +
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(ap->lock, flags);
> ata_eh_release(ap);
> } else {
> @@ -962,7 +968,7 @@ void ata_std_end_eh(struct ata_port *ap)
> {
> struct Scsi_Host *host = ap->scsi_host;
>
> - host->host_eh_scheduled = 0;
> + host->host_eh_scheduled--;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ata_std_end_eh);
>
> @@ -3948,10 +3954,6 @@ void ata_eh_finish(struct ata_port *ap)
> }
> }
> }
> -
> - /* make sure nr_active_links is zero after EH */
> - WARN_ON(ap->nr_active_links);
> - ap->nr_active_links = 0;
> }
>
> /**
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Niklas

We have tested this patch and it can fix the bug. Thank you so much. :)

Feel free to add:

Tested-by: Li Nan <linan122@huawei.com>

--
Thanks,
Nan

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-09-04 13:47    [W:0.090 / U:1.324 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site