Messages in this thread | | | From | "Balas, Eliza" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] drivers: misc: adi-axi-tdd: Add TDD engine | Date | Thu, 28 Sep 2023 14:05:20 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 15:23 > To: Balas, Eliza <Eliza.Balas@analog.com> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>; Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>; Conor Dooley > <conor+dt@kernel.org>; Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@amd.com>; Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@amd.com>; Arnd Bergmann > <arnd@arndb.de>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drivers: misc: adi-axi-tdd: Add TDD engine > > [External] > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 12:28:04PM +0300, Eliza Balas wrote: > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/misc/adi-axi-tdd.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,780 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause) > > License comment, why is this dual licensed? You are calling > gpl-only-marked functions in this driver so attempting to say it is also > BSD is quite odd, how are you going to resolve that? > > Has a lawyer agreed with this licensing? > > Please get a lawyer to sign off on your next contribution of this with a > dual license to ensure that they agree and that you all fully understand > the legal issues and complexity of attempting to have dual-licensed > Linux kernel code (hint, it's not as simple as you might think...) > > And document in the changelog _why_ you want this to be dual licensed so > that we can all review that as well. > > thanks, > > greg k-h
Hello Greg,
Thank you for the review. I will make the changes to use GPL-2.0 license, and not dual license.
Best regards, Eliza
| |