lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH v2 2/2] drivers: misc: adi-axi-tdd: Add TDD engine
Date
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 15:23
> To: Balas, Eliza <Eliza.Balas@analog.com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>; Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>; Conor Dooley
> <conor+dt@kernel.org>; Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@amd.com>; Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@amd.com>; Arnd Bergmann
> <arnd@arndb.de>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drivers: misc: adi-axi-tdd: Add TDD engine
>
> [External]
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 12:28:04PM +0300, Eliza Balas wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/adi-axi-tdd.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,780 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause)
>
> License comment, why is this dual licensed? You are calling
> gpl-only-marked functions in this driver so attempting to say it is also
> BSD is quite odd, how are you going to resolve that?
>
> Has a lawyer agreed with this licensing?
>
> Please get a lawyer to sign off on your next contribution of this with a
> dual license to ensure that they agree and that you all fully understand
> the legal issues and complexity of attempting to have dual-licensed
> Linux kernel code (hint, it's not as simple as you might think...)
>
> And document in the changelog _why_ you want this to be dual licensed so
> that we can all review that as well.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Hello Greg,

Thank you for the review. I will make the changes to use GPL-2.0 license, and not dual license.

Best regards,
Eliza

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-09-28 16:06    [W:0.398 / U:0.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site