Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 25 Sep 2023 11:38:59 -0700 | From | Nicolin Chen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add boolean bypass_ste and skip_cdtab flags |
| |
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 02:57:08PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 01:52:03PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > If a master has only a default substream, it can skip CD/translation table > > allocations when being attached to an IDENTITY domain, by simply setting > > STE to the "bypass" mode (STE.Config[2:0] == 0b100). > > > > If a master has multiple substreams, it will still need a CD table for the > > non-default substreams when being attached to an IDENTITY domain, in which > > case the STE.Config is set to the "stage-1 translate" mode while STE.S1DSS > > field instead is set to the "bypass" mode (STE.S1DSS[1:0] == 0b01). > > > > If a master is attached to a stage-2 domain, it does not need a CD table, > > while the STE.Config is set to the "stage-2 translate" mode. > > > > Add boolean bypass_ste and skip_cdtab flags in arm_smmu_attach_dev(), to > > handle clearly the cases above, which also corrects the conditions at the > > ats_enabled setting and arm_smmu_alloc_cd_tables() callback to cover the > > second use case. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com> > > --- > > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c > > index df6409017127..dbe11997b4b9 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c > > @@ -2381,6 +2381,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev) > > struct arm_smmu_device *smmu; > > struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain); > > struct arm_smmu_master *master; > > + bool byapss_ste, skip_cdtab; > > > > if (!fwspec) > > return -ENOENT; > > @@ -2416,6 +2417,24 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev) > > > > master->domain = smmu_domain; > > > > + /* > > + * When master attaches ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_BYPASS to its single substream, > > + * set STE.Config to "bypass" and skip a CD table allocation. Otherwise, > > + * set STE.Config to "stage-1 translate" and allocate a CD table for its > > + * multiple stage-1 substream support, unless with a stage-2 domain in > > + * which case set STE.config to "stage-2 translate" and skip a CD table. > > + */ > > It might be clearer like this: > > static bool arm_smmu_domain_needs_cdtab(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain, > struct arm_smmu_master *master) > { > switch (smmu_domain->stage) { > /* > * The SMMU can support IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY either by programming > * STE.Config to 0b100 (bypass) or by configuring STE.Config to 0b101 > * (S1 translate) and setting STE.S1DSS[1:0] to 0b01 "bypass". The > * latter requires allocating a CD table. > * > * The 0b100 config has the drawback that ATS and PASID cannot be used, > * however it could be higher performance. Select the "S1 translation" > * option if we might need those features. > */ > case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_BYPASS: > return master->ssid_bits || arm_smmu_ats_supported(master); > case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1: > case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED: > return true; > case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S2: > return false; > } > return false; > } > > Then the below is > > if (needs_cdtab || smm_domain->stage != ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_BYPASS) > master->ats_enabled = arm_smmu_ats_supported(master); > > And the CD table should be sync'd to the result of arm_smmu_domain_needs_cdtab()..
Ack.
> It looks like there is still some kind of logic missing as we need to > know if there are any PASIDs using the cd table here: > > if (!master->cd_table_empty && !needs_cdtab) > return -EBUSY; > > if (needs_ctab && !master->cd_table.cdtab) > ret = arm_smmu_alloc_cd_tables(master); > > if (!needs_ctab && master->cd_table.cdtab) > arm_smmu_dealloc_cd_tables(master); > > And add master->cd_table_emty to the arm_smmu_domain_needs_cdtab bypass logic.
OK. I will give it a try.
> Also, are these patches are out of order, this should come last since > the arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent hasn't learned yet how to do > STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_BYPASS?
Hmm. It could although it's a status quo IMHO -- in practical only ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_BYPASS would be changed by the 1st patch to allocating a CD table that still doesn't work since this STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_BYPASS is unset.
Thanks Nic
| |