Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 23 Sep 2023 09:06:28 +0300 | Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] define and enforce phylink bindings | From | Arınç ÜNAL <> |
| |
On 23.09.2023 01:44, Andrew Lunn wrote: >> However, to dress this up as "phylink requires xyz, so lets create >> a phylink binding description" is just wrong. > > +1 > > Also, phylink is a Linux implementation detail. Other OSes using the > binding don't need to have phylink. Yet they can still use the DT > blobs because they should describe the hardware, independent of how > the OS drives that hardware.
I haven't stated it directly but I've been agreeing to this fact since the start of the discussion on patch 7.
Arınç
| |