lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] define and enforce phylink bindings
From
On 23.09.2023 01:44, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> However, to dress this up as "phylink requires xyz, so lets create
>> a phylink binding description" is just wrong.
>
> +1
>
> Also, phylink is a Linux implementation detail. Other OSes using the
> binding don't need to have phylink. Yet they can still use the DT
> blobs because they should describe the hardware, independent of how
> the OS drives that hardware.

I haven't stated it directly but I've been agreeing to this fact since the
start of the discussion on patch 7.

Arınç

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-09-23 08:08    [W:0.080 / U:0.680 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site