Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 23 Sep 2023 05:16:11 -0700 | From | Zev Weiss <> | Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH] regulator: userspace-consumer: Retrieve supplies from DT |
| |
On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 05:02:59AM PDT, Zev Weiss wrote: >Hi Naresh, > >This looks basically alright to me, though a few suggested tweaks >below... > >On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 02:03:29AM PDT, Naresh Solanki wrote: >>From: Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com> >> >>Instead of hardcoding a single supply, retrieve supplies from DT. >> >>Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com> >>--- >>drivers/regulator/userspace-consumer.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >>1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >>diff --git a/drivers/regulator/userspace-consumer.c b/drivers/regulator/userspace-consumer.c >>index 97f075ed68c9..a3d3e1e6ca74 100644 >>--- a/drivers/regulator/userspace-consumer.c >>+++ b/drivers/regulator/userspace-consumer.c >>@@ -115,11 +115,32 @@ static const struct attribute_group attr_group = { >> .is_visible = attr_visible, >>}; >> >>+#define SUPPLY_SUFFIX "-supply" >>+#define SUPPLY_SUFFIX_LEN 7 > >I think 'strlen(SUPPLY_SUFFIX)' would be preferable to a numeric >literal here; it's less fragile and the compiler can evaluate it at >compile-time anyway (not that it's likely to be performance-critical >in this context I'd expect). > >>+ >>+static int get_num_supplies(struct platform_device *pdev) >>+{ >>+ struct property *prop; >>+ int num_supplies = 0; >>+ >>+ for_each_property_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, prop) { >>+ const char *prop_name = prop->name; >>+ int len = strlen(prop_name); >>+ >>+ if (len > SUPPLY_SUFFIX_LEN && >>+ strcmp(prop_name + len - SUPPLY_SUFFIX_LEN, SUPPLY_SUFFIX) == 0) { >>+ num_supplies++; >>+ } > >Preferred coding style is to omit braces around single-line 'if' blocks. > >>+ } >>+ return num_supplies; >>+} >>+ >>static int regulator_userspace_consumer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>{ >> struct regulator_userspace_consumer_data tmpdata; >> struct regulator_userspace_consumer_data *pdata; >> struct userspace_consumer_data *drvdata; >>+ struct property *prop; > >Looks like there's an extra space after 'struct' here. > >> int ret; >> >> pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev); >>@@ -131,11 +152,27 @@ static int regulator_userspace_consumer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> memset(pdata, 0, sizeof(*pdata)); >> >> pdata->no_autoswitch = true; >>- pdata->num_supplies = 1; >>- pdata->supplies = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pdata->supplies), GFP_KERNEL); >>+ pdata->num_supplies = get_num_supplies(pdev); >>+ >>+ pdata->supplies = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, pdata->num_supplies * >>+ sizeof(*pdata->supplies), GFP_KERNEL); > >Splitting the multiplication across two lines like that isn't great >readability-wise IMO; it might be better to just assign it to a >variable and use that instead to make things fit nicely. > >> if (!pdata->supplies) >> return -ENOMEM; >>- pdata->supplies[0].supply = "vout"; >>+ >>+ for_each_property_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, prop) { >>+ const char *prop_name = prop->name; >>+ int len = strlen(prop_name); >>+ >>+ if (len > SUPPLY_SUFFIX_LEN && >>+ strcmp(prop_name + len - SUPPLY_SUFFIX_LEN, SUPPLY_SUFFIX) == 0) { > >Rather than duplicating this suffix-checking code, how about factoring >out a helper function like prop_is_supply() or something to use both >here and in get_num_supplies()? > >Or actually to make it integrate here a little more nicely, you could >have something like 'size_t prop_supply_name(char*)', returning zero
Or rather prop_supply_name_len(), to make the name a bit more accurate.
>if it doesn't end with "-supply", and the length of the name before >the suffix if it does, so that get_num_supplies() could use it as a >boolean and the code below could use the length to determine the >allocation size. > >>+ char *supply_name = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, >>+ len - SUPPLY_SUFFIX_LEN + 1, >>+ GFP_KERNEL); >>+ strscpy(supply_name, prop_name, len - SUPPLY_SUFFIX_LEN); >>+ supply_name[len - SUPPLY_SUFFIX_LEN] = '\0';
Also, kstrndup() would be a cleaner replacement for these lines, though then the cleanup would get messy, and sadly a devm_kstrndup() doesn't currently exist -- maybe it'd be worth adding separately? Or alternately you could just use devm_kstrdup() and then truncate it by inserting a '\0'.
>>+ pdata->supplies[0].supply = supply_name; >>+ } >>+ } >> } >> >> if (pdata->num_supplies < 1) { >> >>base-commit: 451e85e29c9d6f20639d4cfcff4b9dea280178cc >>-- >>2.41.0 >>
| |