lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC 00/23] Enable block size > page size in XFS
lOn Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 04:03:56PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> So there's clearly something wrong here - it's likely that the
> filesystem IO alignment parameters pulled from the underlying block
> device (4k physical, 512 byte logical sector sizes) are improperly
> interpreted. i.e. for a filesystem with a sector size of 4kB,
> direct IO with an alignment of 512 bytes should be rejected......

I wonder if it's something in the truncation code that's splitting folios
that ought not to be split. Does this test possibly keep folios in
cache that maybe get invalidated?

truncate_inode_partial_folio() is the one i'm most concernd about.
but i'm also severely jetlagged.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-09-22 21:38    [W:0.079 / U:22.520 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site