Messages in this thread | | | From | Saranya Muruganandam <> | Date | Fri, 22 Sep 2023 11:21:10 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] block: fix use-after-free of q->q_usage_counter |
| |
Apologies for leaving out the stable release info. This is for both 5.10 and patch applies cleanly for 5.15.
I just sent out a (different) modified patch for 6.1 LTS.
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 2:26 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 11:20:12AM -0700, Saranya Muruganandam wrote: > > From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> > > > > commit d36a9ea5e7766961e753ee38d4c331bbe6ef659b upstream. > > > > For blk-mq, queue release handler is usually called after > > blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() returns. However, the > > q_usage_counter->release() handler may not be run yet at that time, so > > this can cause a use-after-free. > > > > Fix the issue by moving percpu_ref_exit() into blk_free_queue_rcu(). > > Since ->release() is called with rcu read lock held, it is agreed that > > the race should be covered in caller per discussion from the two links. > > > > Backport-notes: Not a clean cherry-pick since a lot has changed, > > however essentially the same fix. > > > > Reported-by: Zhang Wensheng <zhangwensheng@huaweicloud.com> > > Reported-by: Zhong Jinghua <zhongjinghua@huawei.com> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/Y5prfOjyyjQKUrtH@T590/T/#u > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y4%2FmzMd4evRg9yDi@fedora/ > > Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> > > Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> > > Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> > > Fixes: 2b0d3d3e4fcf ("percpu_ref: reduce memory footprint of percpu_ref in fast path") > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221215021629.74870-1-ming.lei@redhat.com > > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> > > Signed-off-by: Saranya Muruganandam <saranyamohan@google.com> > > --- > > block/blk-core.c | 2 -- > > block/blk-sysfs.c | 2 ++ > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > What stable kernel(s) are you expecting this backport to be applied to? > > thanks, > > greg "not a mind reader" k-h
| |