Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 20 Sep 2023 09:47:52 +0200 | From | Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <> | Subject | [PATCH] signal: Correct spelling typos in ptrace_stop(). |
| |
Ingo spotted typos in the recently added comment and suggested corrections.
Use 'On' instead of 'One' and remove one superfluous 'the' in a sentence.
Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> --- kernel/signal.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c index f2a5578326ade..384b77ad1bc15 100644 --- a/kernel/signal.c +++ b/kernel/signal.c @@ -2330,7 +2330,7 @@ static int ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int why, unsigned long message, /* * The previous do_notify_parent_cldstop() invocation woke ptracer. - * One a PREEMPTION kernel this can result in preemption requirement + * On a PREEMPTION kernel this can result in preemption requirement * which will be fulfilled after read_unlock() and the ptracer will be * put on the CPU. * The ptracer is in wait_task_inactive(, __TASK_TRACED) waiting for @@ -2343,7 +2343,7 @@ static int ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int why, unsigned long message, * view but extends the runtime by one HZ tick time due to the * ptracer's sleep. The preempt-disable section ensures that there * will be no preemption between unlock and schedule() and so - * improving the performance since the ptracer will observe that + * improving performance since the ptracer will observe that * the tracee is scheduled out once it gets on the CPU. * * On PREEMPT_RT locking tasklist_lock does not disable preemption. -- 2.40.1
| |