lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: Arches that don't support PREEMPT
From

On 19/09/2023 16:17, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19 2023 at 15:21, Anton Ivanov wrote:
>> On 19/09/2023 14:42, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> If you're working on one of them, then surely it's a simple matter of
>>> working on adding CONFIG_PREEMPT support :-)
>> In the case of UML adding preempt will be quite difficult. I looked at
>> this a few years back.
> What's so difficult about it?

It's been a while. I remember that I dropped it at the time, but do not remember the full details.

There was some stuff related to FP state and a few other issues I ran into while rewriting the interrupt controller. Some of it may be resolved by now as we are using host cpu flags, etc.

I can give it another go :)

>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
--
Anton R. Ivanov
Cambridgegreys Limited. Registered in England. Company Number 10273661
https://www.cambridgegreys.com/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-09-19 17:22    [W:0.238 / U:0.320 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site