lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH V1 0/6] sched/numa: Enhance disjoint VMA scanning
From
On 9/19/2023 12:45 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@amd.com> wrote:
>
>> On 8/29/2023 11:36 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
[...]

>>>
>>> Peter Zijlstra (1):
>>> sched/numa: Increase tasks' access history
>>>
>>> Raghavendra K T (5):
>>> sched/numa: Move up the access pid reset logic
>>> sched/numa: Add disjoint vma unconditional scan logic
>>> sched/numa: Remove unconditional scan logic using mm numa_scan_seq
>>> sched/numa: Allow recently accessed VMAs to be scanned
>>> sched/numa: Allow scanning of shared VMAs
>>>
>>> include/linux/mm.h | 12 +++--
>>> include/linux/mm_types.h | 5 +-
>>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>> 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Hello Andrew,
>>
>> I am Resending patch rebasing to mm-unstable, adding results from Oliver
>> and Swapnil.
>
> Just for the record, a final version of this series should be submitted via
> the scheduler tree, not -mm.
>

Thank you for the clarification Ingo.. May be Andrew also wanted me to
rebase directly to
scheduler tree. Last time patch series (numa scan enhancements) had
changes in mm/, but this time it is mostly fair.c.

I hope I have not missed anybody who should have been in the list from
sched side.

-Raghu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-09-19 10:57    [W:1.556 / U:0.744 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site