Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Sep 2023 11:26:42 +0100 | From | Sudeep Holla <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] arm_scmi/cpufreq: Add generic performance scaling support |
| |
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 12:45:02AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > Sudeep, Christian, > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 13:26, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > Changes in v3: > > - Re-based upon the for-next/scmi/updates branch. > > - Re-ordered some of the patches in the series, to eas review. > > - Added some new DT doc patches in the series, according to comments. > > - Fixed other comments, see version history for each patch. > > > > Changes in v2: > > - Split up the series, to get the basic support in place as the first > > step. The part that remains is the integration with the OPP library, to > > allow consumer drivers to change performance level using the OPP lib. > > - Re-based on top v6.5-rc1. > > - Other changes will be described for each patch. > > > > The current SCMI performance scaling support is limited to cpufreq. This series > > extends the support, so it can be used for all kind of devices and not only for > > CPUs. > > > > The changes are spread over a couple of different subsystems, although the > > changes that affects the other subsystems than the arm_scmi directory are > > mostly smaller, except for last patch which is in the new genpd directory. > > > > The series is based upon the for-next/scmi/updates branch, but to enable the > > genpd provider in patch 13 (the actual scmi performance domain driver) to be > > placed in the new genpd directory, I have also merged an immutable branch [1], > > which is queued for v6.6. > > > > Note that, I am runing this on the Qemu virt platform with Optee running an SCMI > > server. If you want some more details about my test setup, I can share this with > > you, just let me know. > > > > Looking forward to your feedback! > > > > Kind regards > > Ulf Hansson > > > > [1] > > git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/people/ulf.hansson/linux-pm.git genpd_create_dir > > > > > > Ulf Hansson (13): > > firmware: arm_scmi: Extend perf protocol ops to get number of domains > > firmware: arm_scmi: Extend perf protocol ops to get information of a > > domain > > cpufreq: scmi: Prepare to move OF parsing of domain-id to cpufreq > > firmware: arm_scmi: Align perf ops to use domain-id as in-parameter > > firmware: arm_scmi: Drop redundant ->device_domain_id() from perf ops > > cpufreq: scmi: Avoid one OF parsing in scmi_get_sharing_cpus() > > cpufreq: scmi: Drop redundant ifdef in scmi_cpufreq_probe() > > dt-bindings: arm: cpus: Add a power-domain-name for a > > performance-domain > > dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Extend bindings for protocol@13 > > dt-bindings: power: Clarify performance capabilities of power-domains > > cpufreq: scmi: Add support to parse domain-id using > > #power-domain-cells > > PM: domains: Allow genpd providers to manage OPP tables directly by > > its FW > > genpd: arm: Add the SCMI performance domain > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml | 4 +- > > .../bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml | 11 +- > > .../bindings/power/power-domain.yaml | 17 +- > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > drivers/base/power/domain.c | 11 +- > > drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 55 +++++-- > > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Kconfig | 12 ++ > > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 90 +++++------ > > drivers/genpd/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/genpd/arm/Makefile | 3 + > > drivers/genpd/arm/scmi_perf_domain.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/pm_domain.h | 5 + > > include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 18 ++- > > 13 files changed, 293 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 drivers/genpd/arm/Makefile > > create mode 100644 drivers/genpd/arm/scmi_perf_domain.c > > > > Unless you have some additional comments, I think patch 1 -> 12 should > be ready to be applied to your scmi tree, as is. I tried to apply it > today and did not encounter any problem. >
Sorry for the delay, was off few days last week. I will take a look at the series later this week
> Patch 13 needs a rebase so I will submit a new version of it. For you > to apply it to your tree, you need to move your scmi branch to > v6.6-rc2 (on Monday), would that be okay for you to manage? >
Sure I can rebase on -rc2. I assume Arnd is aware of the dependency and must be OK with that. The general preference/expectation is -rc1 but I understand the exception this time.
-- Regards, Sudeep
| |