Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 10 Sep 2023 11:04:30 -0400 | From | Jon Mason <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ntb_perf: Fix printk format |
| |
On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 12:34:34AM -0700, Max Hawking wrote: > The correct printk format is %pa or %pap, but not %pa[p]. > > Fixes: 99a06056124d ("NTB: ntb_perf: Fix address err in perf_copy_chunk") > Signed-off-by: Max Hawking <maxahawking@sonnenkinder.org> > --- > drivers/ntb/test/ntb_perf.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ntb/test/ntb_perf.c b/drivers/ntb/test/ntb_perf.c > index 553f1f46bc66..72bc1d017a46 100644 > --- a/drivers/ntb/test/ntb_perf.c > +++ b/drivers/ntb/test/ntb_perf.c > @@ -1227,7 +1227,7 @@ static ssize_t perf_dbgfs_read_info(struct file > *filep, char __user *ubuf, > "\tOut buffer addr 0x%pK\n", peer->outbuf); > > pos += scnprintf(buf + pos, buf_size - pos, > - "\tOut buff phys addr %pa[p]\n", &peer->out_phys_addr); > + "\tOut buff phys addr %pap\n", &peer->out_phys_addr); > > pos += scnprintf(buf + pos, buf_size - pos, > "\tOut buffer size %pa\n", &peer->outbuf_size); > -- > 2.41.0
For some reason this patch isn't applying cleanly for me, I'm seeing the following issue: $ b4 am -o - f2fb85b9-278d-9e12-b61c-d951c71bf2f6@gmx.net | patch -p1
...
patching file drivers/ntb/test/ntb_perf.c patch: **** malformed patch at line 23: *filep, char __user *ubuf,
Please rebase and resend.
Thanks, Jon
| |