lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 08/12] iommu: Prepare for separating SVA and IOPF
From
On 2023/8/9 8:02, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2023 2:43 AM
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 08:16:47AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>
>>> Is there plan to introduce further error in the future? otherwise this should
>>> be void.
>>>
>>> btw the work queue is only for sva. If there is no other caller this can be
>>> just kept in iommu-sva.c. No need to create a helper.
>>
>> I think more than just SVA will need a work queue context to process
>> their faults.
>>
>
> then this series needs more work. Currently the abstraction doesn't
> include workqueue in the common fault reporting layer.

Do you mind elaborate a bit here? workqueue is a basic infrastructure in
the fault handling framework, but it lets the consumers choose to use
it, or not to.

Best regards,
baolu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-08-09 12:41    [W:0.068 / U:0.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site