Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Aug 2023 18:40:56 +0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 08/12] iommu: Prepare for separating SVA and IOPF | From | Baolu Lu <> |
| |
On 2023/8/9 8:02, Tian, Kevin wrote: >> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2023 2:43 AM >> >> On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 08:16:47AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote: >> >>> Is there plan to introduce further error in the future? otherwise this should >>> be void. >>> >>> btw the work queue is only for sva. If there is no other caller this can be >>> just kept in iommu-sva.c. No need to create a helper. >> >> I think more than just SVA will need a work queue context to process >> their faults. >> > > then this series needs more work. Currently the abstraction doesn't > include workqueue in the common fault reporting layer.
Do you mind elaborate a bit here? workqueue is a basic infrastructure in the fault handling framework, but it lets the consumers choose to use it, or not to.
Best regards, baolu
| |