lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 24/28] pinctrl: Add support for the Lantic PEF2256 pinmux
Hi Herve,

thanks for your patch!

First: is this patch something we could merge separately? I don't see
any dependency on the other patches.

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 5:04 PM Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com> wrote:

> The Lantiq PEF2256 is a framer and line interface component designed to
> fulfill all required interfacing between an analog E1/T1/J1 line and the
> digital PCM system highway/H.100 bus.
>
> This pinmux support handles the pin muxing part (pins RP(A..D) and pins
> XP(A..D)) of the PEF2256.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>

So it is a bridge chip? Please use that terminology since Linux
DRM often talks about bridges.

> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-pef2256-regs.h
(...)
> +#include "linux/bitfield.h"

Really? I don't think there is such a file there.

Do you mean <linux/bitfield.h> and does this even compile?

> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-pef2256.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-pef2256.c
(...)
> +struct pef2256_pinctrl {
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct regmap *regmap;
> + enum pef2256_version version;
> + struct {
> + struct pinctrl_desc pctrl_desc;
> + const struct pef2256_function_desc *functions;
> + unsigned int nfunctions;
> + } pinctrl;

Uh anonymous struct... can't you just define the struct separately
with a name? Or fold it into struct pef2256_pinctrl without the
additional struct? Thanks.

Otherwise it looks neat!

Yours,
Linus Walleij

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-08-07 15:05    [W:0.973 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site