lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 03/12] ceph: handle idmapped mounts in create_request_message()
From

On 8/7/23 18:34, Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 12:28 PM Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 8/7/23 14:51, Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 3:25 AM Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> On 8/4/23 16:48, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
>>>>> From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> Inode operations that create a new filesystem object such as ->mknod,
>>>>> ->create, ->mkdir() and others don't take a {g,u}id argument explicitly.
>>>>> Instead the caller's fs{g,u}id is used for the {g,u}id of the new
>>>>> filesystem object.
>>>>>
>>>>> In order to ensure that the correct {g,u}id is used map the caller's
>>>>> fs{g,u}id for creation requests. This doesn't require complex changes.
>>>>> It suffices to pass in the relevant idmapping recorded in the request
>>>>> message. If this request message was triggered from an inode operation
>>>>> that creates filesystem objects it will have passed down the relevant
>>>>> idmaping. If this is a request message that was triggered from an inode
>>>>> operation that doens't need to take idmappings into account the initial
>>>>> idmapping is passed down which is an identity mapping.
>>>>>
>>>>> This change uses a new cephfs protocol extension CEPHFS_FEATURE_HAS_OWNER_UIDGID
>>>>> which adds two new fields (owner_{u,g}id) to the request head structure.
>>>>> So, we need to ensure that MDS supports it otherwise we need to fail
>>>>> any IO that comes through an idmapped mount because we can't process it
>>>>> in a proper way. MDS server without such an extension will use caller_{u,g}id
>>>>> fields to set a new inode owner UID/GID which is incorrect because caller_{u,g}id
>>>>> values are unmapped. At the same time we can't map these fields with an
>>>>> idmapping as it can break UID/GID-based permission checks logic on the
>>>>> MDS side. This problem was described with a lot of details at [1], [2].
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAEivzxfw1fHO2TFA4dx3u23ZKK6Q+EThfzuibrhA3RKM=ZOYLg@mail.gmail.com/
>>>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220104140414.155198-3-brauner@kernel.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> Link: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/52575
>>>>> Link: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/62217
>>>>> Cc: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
>>>>> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
>>>>> Cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
>>>>> Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
>>>>> Co-Developed-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> v7:
>>>>> - reworked to use two new fields for owner UID/GID (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/52575)
>>>>> v8:
>>>>> - properly handled case when old MDS used with new kernel client
>>>>> ---
>>>>> fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>>> fs/ceph/mds_client.h | 5 +++-
>>>>> include/linux/ceph/ceph_fs.h | 5 +++-
>>>>> 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
>>>>> index 8829f55103da..41e4bf3811c4 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
>>>>> @@ -2902,6 +2902,17 @@ static void encode_mclientrequest_tail(void **p, const struct ceph_mds_request *
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +static inline u16 mds_supported_head_version(struct ceph_mds_session *session)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + if (!test_bit(CEPHFS_FEATURE_32BITS_RETRY_FWD, &session->s_features))
>>>>> + return 1;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!test_bit(CEPHFS_FEATURE_HAS_OWNER_UIDGID, &session->s_features))
>>>>> + return 2;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return CEPH_MDS_REQUEST_HEAD_VERSION;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> static struct ceph_mds_request_head_legacy *
>>>>> find_legacy_request_head(void *p, u64 features)
>>>>> {
>>>>> @@ -2923,6 +2934,7 @@ static struct ceph_msg *create_request_message(struct ceph_mds_session *session,
>>>>> {
>>>>> int mds = session->s_mds;
>>>>> struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc = session->s_mdsc;
>>>>> + struct ceph_client *cl = mdsc->fsc->client;
>>>>> struct ceph_msg *msg;
>>>>> struct ceph_mds_request_head_legacy *lhead;
>>>>> const char *path1 = NULL;
>>>>> @@ -2936,7 +2948,7 @@ static struct ceph_msg *create_request_message(struct ceph_mds_session *session,
>>>>> void *p, *end;
>>>>> int ret;
>>>>> bool legacy = !(session->s_con.peer_features & CEPH_FEATURE_FS_BTIME);
>>>>> - bool old_version = !test_bit(CEPHFS_FEATURE_32BITS_RETRY_FWD, &session->s_features);
>>>>> + u16 request_head_version = mds_supported_head_version(session);
>>>>>
>>>>> ret = set_request_path_attr(mdsc, req->r_inode, req->r_dentry,
>>>>> req->r_parent, req->r_path1, req->r_ino1.ino,
>>>>> @@ -2977,8 +2989,10 @@ static struct ceph_msg *create_request_message(struct ceph_mds_session *session,
>>>>> */
>>>>> if (legacy)
>>>>> len = sizeof(struct ceph_mds_request_head_legacy);
>>>>> - else if (old_version)
>>>>> + else if (request_head_version == 1)
>>>>> len = sizeof(struct ceph_mds_request_head_old);
>>>>> + else if (request_head_version == 2)
>>>>> + len = offsetofend(struct ceph_mds_request_head, ext_num_fwd);
>>>>> else
>>>>> len = sizeof(struct ceph_mds_request_head);
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -3028,6 +3042,16 @@ static struct ceph_msg *create_request_message(struct ceph_mds_session *session,
>>>>> lhead = find_legacy_request_head(msg->front.iov_base,
>>>>> session->s_con.peer_features);
>>>>>
>>>>> + if ((req->r_mnt_idmap != &nop_mnt_idmap) &&
>>>>> + !test_bit(CEPHFS_FEATURE_HAS_OWNER_UIDGID, &session->s_features)) {
>>>>> + pr_err_ratelimited_client(cl,
>>>>> + "idmapped mount is used and CEPHFS_FEATURE_HAS_OWNER_UIDGID"
>>>>> + " is not supported by MDS. Fail request with -EIO.\n");
>>>>> +
>>>>> + ret = -EIO;
>>>>> + goto out_err;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * The ceph_mds_request_head_legacy didn't contain a version field, and
>>>>> * one was added when we moved the message version from 3->4.
>>>>> @@ -3035,17 +3059,34 @@ static struct ceph_msg *create_request_message(struct ceph_mds_session *session,
>>>>> if (legacy) {
>>>>> msg->hdr.version = cpu_to_le16(3);
>>>>> p = msg->front.iov_base + sizeof(*lhead);
>>>>> - } else if (old_version) {
>>>>> + } else if (request_head_version == 1) {
>>>>> struct ceph_mds_request_head_old *ohead = msg->front.iov_base;
>>>>>
>>>>> msg->hdr.version = cpu_to_le16(4);
>>>>> ohead->version = cpu_to_le16(1);
>>>>> p = msg->front.iov_base + sizeof(*ohead);
>>>>> + } else if (request_head_version == 2) {
>>>>> + struct ceph_mds_request_head *nhead = msg->front.iov_base;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + msg->hdr.version = cpu_to_le16(6);
>>>>> + nhead->version = cpu_to_le16(2);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + p = msg->front.iov_base + offsetofend(struct ceph_mds_request_head, ext_num_fwd);
>>>>> } else {
>>>>> struct ceph_mds_request_head *nhead = msg->front.iov_base;
>>>>> + kuid_t owner_fsuid;
>>>>> + kgid_t owner_fsgid;
>>>>>
>>>>> msg->hdr.version = cpu_to_le16(6);
>>>>> nhead->version = cpu_to_le16(CEPH_MDS_REQUEST_HEAD_VERSION);
>>>>> + nhead->struct_len = sizeof(struct ceph_mds_request_head);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + owner_fsuid = from_vfsuid(req->r_mnt_idmap, &init_user_ns,
>>>>> + VFSUIDT_INIT(req->r_cred->fsuid));
>>>>> + owner_fsgid = from_vfsgid(req->r_mnt_idmap, &init_user_ns,
>>>>> + VFSGIDT_INIT(req->r_cred->fsgid));
>>>>> + nhead->owner_uid = cpu_to_le32(from_kuid(&init_user_ns, owner_fsuid));
>>>>> + nhead->owner_gid = cpu_to_le32(from_kgid(&init_user_ns, owner_fsgid));
>>>>> p = msg->front.iov_base + sizeof(*nhead);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.h b/fs/ceph/mds_client.h
>>>>> index e3bbf3ba8ee8..8f683e8203bd 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.h
>>>>> +++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.h
>>>>> @@ -33,8 +33,10 @@ enum ceph_feature_type {
>>>>> CEPHFS_FEATURE_NOTIFY_SESSION_STATE,
>>>>> CEPHFS_FEATURE_OP_GETVXATTR,
>>>>> CEPHFS_FEATURE_32BITS_RETRY_FWD,
>>>>> + CEPHFS_FEATURE_NEW_SNAPREALM_INFO,
>>>>> + CEPHFS_FEATURE_HAS_OWNER_UIDGID,
>>>>>
>>>>> - CEPHFS_FEATURE_MAX = CEPHFS_FEATURE_32BITS_RETRY_FWD,
>>>>> + CEPHFS_FEATURE_MAX = CEPHFS_FEATURE_HAS_OWNER_UIDGID,
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> #define CEPHFS_FEATURES_CLIENT_SUPPORTED { \
>>>>> @@ -49,6 +51,7 @@ enum ceph_feature_type {
>>>>> CEPHFS_FEATURE_NOTIFY_SESSION_STATE, \
>>>>> CEPHFS_FEATURE_OP_GETVXATTR, \
>>>>> CEPHFS_FEATURE_32BITS_RETRY_FWD, \
>>>>> + CEPHFS_FEATURE_HAS_OWNER_UIDGID, \
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/ceph/ceph_fs.h b/include/linux/ceph/ceph_fs.h
>>>>> index 5f2301ee88bc..b91699b08f26 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/linux/ceph/ceph_fs.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/ceph/ceph_fs.h
>>>>> @@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ struct ceph_mds_request_head_legacy {
>>>>> union ceph_mds_request_args args;
>>>>> } __attribute__ ((packed));
>>>>>
>>>>> -#define CEPH_MDS_REQUEST_HEAD_VERSION 2
>>>>> +#define CEPH_MDS_REQUEST_HEAD_VERSION 3
>>>>>
>>>>> struct ceph_mds_request_head_old {
>>>>> __le16 version; /* struct version */
>>>>> @@ -530,6 +530,9 @@ struct ceph_mds_request_head {
>>>>>
>>>>> __le32 ext_num_retry; /* new count retry attempts */
>>>>> __le32 ext_num_fwd; /* new count fwd attempts */
>>>>> +
>>>>> + __le32 struct_len; /* to store size of struct ceph_mds_request_head */
>>>>> + __le32 owner_uid, owner_gid; /* used for OPs which create inodes */
>>>> Let's also initialize them to -1 for all the other requests as we do in
>>>> your PR.
>>> They are always initialized already. As you can see from the code we
>>> don't have any extra conditions
>>> on filling these fields. We always fill them with an appropriate
>>> UID/GID. If mount is not idmapped then it's just == caller_uid/gid,
>>> if mount idmapped then it's idmapped caller_uid/gid.
>> Then in kclient all the request will always initialized the
>> 'owner_{uid/gid}' with 'caller_{uid/gid}'. While in userspace libcephfs
>> it will only set them for 'create/mknod/mkdir/symlink` instead.
>>
>> I'd prefer to make them consistent, which is what I am still focusing
>> on, to make them easier to read and comparing when troubles hooting.
> Dear Xiubo,
>
> Sure, I will do it.
>
> Couldn't you please review all the rest of the patches before I fix
> this particular thing?
> It will allow me to fix and send -v10 with all required fixes
> incorporated in it.

I have gone through them all and they LGTM.

Thanks

- Xiubo


> Kind regards,
> Alex
>
>> Thanks
>>
>> - Xiubo
>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> - Xiubo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> } __attribute__ ((packed));
>>>>>
>>>>> /* cap/lease release record */

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-08-07 13:42    [W:7.693 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site