Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 4 Aug 2023 15:15:43 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: defconfig: Enable PRUSS as module | From | "Anwar, Md Danish" <> |
| |
On 8/4/2023 2:50 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Aug 4, 2023, at 11:11, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 4.08.2023 08:18, MD Danish Anwar wrote: >>> Enables PRUSS as kernel module for TI SoCs. >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@gmail.com> >>> Signed-off-by: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@ti.com> >>> --- >> As an outsider, I have no idea what this does, and the Kconfig help >> message doesn't say much more either. >> >> Could you please add a short summary about what sort of hardware >> is driven by this driver? > > Any additional information would also help, but more importantly, > Danish please use a recipient list that has only the people on 'To:' > that would actually apply the patch (Nishanth and Vignesh) and > ask them to merge it, while having everyone else on Cc. >
Sure Arnd, I will only keep Nishant and Vignesh in to and move everyone else to Cc.
> The problem with addressing a trivial patch to a dozen people > is that often everyone will think that someone else will take > care of it. If you address a patch to just one or two maintainers, > they are more likely to either apply it or tell you if you got > the wrong person instead of ignoring. > > For defconfig patches adding platform specific lines, there are > two ways this can be handled: > > a) the K3 maintainers pick it up into a branch and send a > pull request to soc@kernel.org with all the defconfig > changes, from where I pick that up. This usually works > best. > > b) you send it to soc@kernel.org yourself and I wait for > an Ack from the K3 maintainers so I know they agree with > the contents as well as being bypassed as maintainers on > this occasion. > > Arnd
-- Thanks and Regards, Md Danish Anwar
| |