lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next 0/3] virtchnl: fix fake 1-elem arrays
From
From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 11:07:14 -0700

> On 8/4/2023 9:38 AM, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>> From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
>> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 17:52:04 +0200
>>
>>> 6.5-rc1 started spitting warning splats when composing virtchnl
>>> messages, precisely on virtchnl_rss_key and virtchnl_lut:
>>>
>>> [   84.167709] memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 52) of single
>>> field "vrk->key" at drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_virtchnl.c:1095
>>> (size 1)
>>> [   84.169915] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 11 at drivers/net/ethernet/intel/
>>> iavf/iavf_virtchnl.c:1095 iavf_set_rss_key+0x123/0x140 [iavf]
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>   .../ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c    |   9 +-
>>>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf.h        |   6 +-
>>>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_client.c |   4 +-
>>>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_client.h |   2 +-
>>>   .../net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_virtchnl.c   |  75 +++++------
>>>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl.c |   2 +-
>>>   include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h                  | 127 +++++++++++-------
>>>   7 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Tony, could you please take it via your next tree? I'd like the
>> validation to make sure more different host <-> guest pairs work.
>>
>> (with Kees' tags, assuming he reviewed and approved the whole series, I
>>   asked about #2 already)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Olek
>
> Ok, will apply it today. For the future if you want it through IWL, can

Great, thanks!

> you tag it with the iwl-* target (and have IWL in the To)? Since this
> had 'net-next' and was 'To' netdev maintainers, I took it that you
> wanted it taken through netdev.

Sure, I know, just for some reason targeted this directly to net at
first, but then realized it would be better for this to go via IWL
:clownface:

>
> Thanks,
> Tony

Thanks,
Olek

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-08-04 20:11    [W:0.061 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site