Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 3 Aug 2023 09:36:08 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] arm_pmu: acpi: Add a representative platform device for TRBE | From | Anshuman Khandual <> |
| |
On 8/2/23 15:41, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > On 02/08/2023 02:07, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> >> >> On 8/1/23 20:21, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 03:10:50PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>>> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h >>>> index a0801f68762b..7ec26d21303d 100644 >>>> --- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h >>>> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h >>>> @@ -187,5 +187,6 @@ void armpmu_free_irq(int irq, int cpu); >>>> #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_PMU */ >>>> #define ARMV8_SPE_PDEV_NAME "arm,spe-v1" >>>> +#define ARMV8_TRBE_PDEV_NAME "arm-trbe-acpi" >>> >>> Why is the TRBE name formatted differently to the SPE one? >> >> Nothing specific, although "arm,spe-v1" seemed more like a DT naming >> scheme. But could change the name as "arm,trbe-v1" to be in sync with >> SPE here. > > Do we really need v1 ? I would leave it as arm,trbe
Sure, will make it 'arm,trbe' instead.
| |