Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 29 Aug 2023 17:56:23 +0300 | From | Andy Shevchenko <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/12] bitmap: rework bitmap_{bit,}remap() |
| |
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 06:50:08AM -0700, Yury Norov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 6:39 AM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:33:29AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
...
> > I posted one patch to replace these APIs with something else, more particular > > for GPIO case(s). Have you chance to look at that? With that taking in, I'm > > fully agree on the above statement (as we lose the user of this complicated > > thingy which is a niche of the NUMA as you mentioned already). > > I saw the code in a comment in some thread but not as a separate patch, and > AFAIK you said it's a work-in-progress.
The patch itself is self-contained, the only problem it has no users as is. The work-in-progress for the test cases, but before I continue with that I want to hear if it's accepted approach.
> Sorry if I missed your submission. Can you please send the patch or point me to > the previous submission? > > Also, if after your change bitmap_remap would become a NUMA-specific, should > protect it with NUMA guards?
Rasmus' idea was to move that completely out of the bitmap namespace and scope.
-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
| |