Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Sasha Levin <> | Subject | [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.4 07/17] virtio-mem: convert most offline_and_remove_memory() errors to -EBUSY | Date | Tue, 29 Aug 2023 09:31:54 -0400 |
| |
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit ddf409851461f515cc32974714b73efe2e012bde ]
Just like we do with alloc_contig_range(), let's convert all unknown errors to -EBUSY, but WARN so we can look into the issue. For example, offline_pages() could fail with -EINTR, which would be unexpected in our case.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20230713145551.2824980-3-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c | 12 ++++++++---- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c index ed15d2a4bd96b..1a76ba2bc118c 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c @@ -741,11 +741,15 @@ static int virtio_mem_offline_and_remove_memory(struct virtio_mem *vm, * immediately instead of waiting. */ virtio_mem_retry(vm); - } else { - dev_dbg(&vm->vdev->dev, - "offlining and removing memory failed: %d\n", rc); + return 0; } - return rc; + dev_dbg(&vm->vdev->dev, "offlining and removing memory failed: %d\n", rc); + /* + * We don't really expect this to fail, because we fake-offlined all + * memory already. But it could fail in corner cases. + */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(rc != -ENOMEM && rc != -EBUSY); + return rc == -ENOMEM ? -ENOMEM : -EBUSY; } /* -- 2.40.1
| |