Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 24 Aug 2023 16:40:29 +0200 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] introduce __next_thread(), change next_thread() |
| |
Damn.
Peter Zijlstra's email was wrong. Fix it.
Peter, sorry, you can find this short series on kernel.org, https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230824143112.GA31208@redhat.com/
or I can resend with your email fixed.
On 08/24, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Hello, > > After document-while_each_thread-change-first_tid-to-use-for_each_thread.patch > in mm tree + this series > > 1. We have only one lockless user of next_thread(), task_group_seq_get_next(). > I think it should be changed too. > > 2. We have only one user of task_struct->thread_group, thread_group_empty(). > The next patches will change thread_group_empty() and kill ->thread_group. > > Oleg.
| |