lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 9/9] selftests/sgx: Specify freestanding environment for enclave compilation
From
On Wed Aug 23, 2023 at 3:57 PM EEST, Jo Van Bulck wrote:
> On 22.08.23 12:14, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Do you still need nostdfiles and nostartfiles with freestanding?
>
> Thanks, good question. I tested that compiling with only -ffreestanding
> yields:
>
> /* snipped */
> /usr/local/bin/ld:
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/9/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/rcrt1.o: in
> function `_start':
> (.text+0x24): undefined reference to `main'
> /* snipped */
>
> So we definitely still need -nostartfiles to prevent the compiler/linker
> from introducing the standard system startup functions. However, in my
> understanding, -nostdlib (which is what I assume you mean with
> nostdfiles) already implies the individual options -nodefaultlibs and
> -nostartfiles.
>
> Thus, we definitely still need -nostartfiles and I'm not 100% sure we
> don't need -nostdlib (though it compiles fine for me with only
> -nostartfiles). Gcc only specifies:
>
> -ffreestanding
> Assert that compilation targets a freestanding environment. This
> implies -fno-builtin. A freestanding environment is one in which the
> standard library may not exist, and program startup may not necessarily
> be at "main".
>
> Bottom line: I suggest to keep -nostdlib to be sure and remove
> -nostartfiles (as it is redundant). I'll include this in the next patch
> iteration.
>
> Best,
> Jo

OK, cool, sounds like plan.

BR, Jarkko

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-08-23 19:32    [W:0.054 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site