Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 24 Aug 2023 01:24:43 +0200 | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] docs: submitting-patches: Add Sponsored-by tag to give credits to who sponsored the patch | From | Giulio Benetti <> |
| |
Hello Jacub, All,
On 21/08/23 16:57, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 09:40:59 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> Personally, I would respond "I'm sorry, but the only advertising >> space we offer are Copyright headers (for employees) and >> "user+customer@..." or "name (customer) user@..." (for contractors). > > +1 > >> And this is a separate tag, so it's harder for the analysis tools >> (whose output your customers must be interested in, too?) to >> match the tag to the actual Author/Reviewer/... > > I think that's a key point. Having a separate tag denote the sponsor > would make analysis a lot harder. We'd need to start writing parsers > with much more context awareness.
yes. There are already 2 ways to give credits I was not aware and I will go with one of those.
Thank you for replying Best regards -- Giulio Benetti CEO&CTO@Benetti Engineering sas
| |