lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Aug]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: crypto: qcom,prng: Add SM8450
From
On 21/08/2023 02:52, Om Prakash Singh wrote:
> I meant first one. using "qcom,rng-ee".

Then please provide some reasons.

>
> I am looking for generic compatible string for all SoCs for which core
> clock can be optional, same as we have "qcom,prng-ee".

There is a generic compatible already... but anyway, is the clock really
optional? Or just configured by firmware?

>
> If we are using SoC name in compatible string, for each SoC support we
> need to update qcom,prng.yaml file.

So you were talking about second case from my email? Still not sure what
you want to propose, but just in case - please always follow DT bindings
guidelines:

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1-rc1/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst#L42

Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-08-21 08:08    [W:0.072 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site