lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] blk-mq: release scheduler resource when request complete
From
On 2023/8/17 22:50, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 8/17/23 07:41, kernel test robot wrote:
>> [  222.622837][ T2216] statistics for priority 1: i 276 m 0 d 276 c 278
>> [ 222.629307][ T2216] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2216 at block/mq-deadline.c:680 dd_exit_sched (block/mq-deadline.c:680 (discriminator 3))
>
> The above information shows that dd_inserted_request() has been called
> 276 times and also that dd_finish_request() has been called 278 times.

Thanks much for your help.

This patch indeed introduced a regression, postflush requests will be completed
twice, so here dd_finish_request() is more than dd_inserted_request().

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index a8c63bef8ff1..7cd47ffc04ce 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -686,8 +686,10 @@ static void blk_mq_finish_request(struct request *rq)
{
struct request_queue *q = rq->q;

- if (rq->rq_flags & RQF_USE_SCHED)
+ if (rq->rq_flags & RQF_USE_SCHED) {
q->elevator->type->ops.finish_request(rq);
+ rq->rq_flags &= ~RQF_USE_SCHED;
+ }
}


Clear RQF_USE_SCHED flag here should fix this problem, which should be ok
since finish_request() is the last callback, this flag isn't needed anymore.
Jens, should I send this diff as another patch or resend updated v3?

Thanks.

> Calling dd_finish_request() more than once per request breaks the code
> for priority handling since that code checks how many requests are
> pending per priority level by subtracting the number of completion calls
> from the number of insertion calls (see also dd_queued()). I think the
> above output indicates that this patch introduced a regression.
>
> Bart.
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-08-17 17:31    [W:0.211 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site