lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] rtc: pcf85363: Allow to wake up system without IRQ

Met vriendelijke groet / kind regards,

Mike Looijmans
System Expert


TOPIC Embedded Products B.V.
Materiaalweg 4, 5681 RJ Best
The Netherlands

T: +31 (0) 499 33 69 69
E: mike.looijmans@topic.nl
W: www.topic.nl

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
On 17-08-2023 10:17, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 17/08/2023 07:42:25+0200, Mike Looijmans wrote:
>> On 16-08-2023 23:40, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>>> Hello Mike,
>>>
>>> Sorry for the very late review, there is a small change that is needed:
>>
>> Better late than never
>>
>>>
>>> On 02/05/2023 07:54:58+0200, Mike Looijmans wrote:
>>>> When wakeup-source is set in the devicetree, set up the device for
>>>> using the output as interrupt instead of clock. This is similar to
>>>> how other RTC devices handle this.
>>>>
>>>> This allows the clock chip to turn on the board when wired to do
>>>> so in hardware.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf85363.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
>>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf85363.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf85363.c
>>>> index 8958eadf1c3e..b1543bcdc530 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf85363.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf85363.c
>>>> @@ -434,23 +434,26 @@ static int pcf85363_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>>>> pcf85363->rtc->range_max = RTC_TIMESTAMP_END_2099;
>>>> clear_bit(RTC_FEATURE_ALARM, pcf85363->rtc->features);
>>>> + if (client->irq > 0 || device_property_read_bool(&client->dev,
>>>> + "wakeup-source")) {
>>>> + regmap_write(pcf85363->regmap, CTRL_FLAGS, 0);
>>>> + regmap_update_bits(pcf85363->regmap, CTRL_PIN_IO,
>>>> + PIN_IO_INTA_OUT, PIN_IO_INTAPM);
>>>> + device_init_wakeup(&client->dev, true);
>>>> + set_bit(RTC_FEATURE_ALARM, pcf85363->rtc->features);
>>>
>>> This should not be done when devm_request_threaded_irq fails.
>>
>> Yeah, easiest would be to just clear the feature flag when that happens.
>
> My comment was also for device_init_wakeup(&client->dev, true);. I think
> the easiest would be to move this block later on and set client->irq to
> 0 when devm_request_threaded_irq fails.
>

Ah, clear. That also properly handles things when IRQ fails but wakeup-source
was present. In table form:

IRQ wakeup-source Call "device_init_wakeup" etc.
N/A No No
N/A Yes Yes
OK No Yes
OK Yes Yes
FAIL No No
FAIL Yes Yes

We still have to program the registers before registering the IRQ I think.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-08-17 11:04    [W:0.064 / U:1.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site