Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 17 Aug 2023 10:02:08 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] perf test: Add a test for the new Arm CPU ID comparison behavior | From | James Clark <> |
| |
On 16/08/2023 17:11, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 12:47:44PM +0100, James Clark escreveu: >> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/cpuid-match.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +#include <linux/compiler.h> >> + >> +#include "arch-tests.h" >> +#include "tests/tests.h" >> +#include "util/header.h" >> + >> +int test__cpuid_match(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, >> + int subtest __maybe_unused) >> +{ >> + /* midr with no leading zeros matches */ >> + if (strcmp_cpuid_str("0x410fd0c0", "0x00000000410fd0c0")) >> + return -1; >> + /* Upper case matches */ >> + if (strcmp_cpuid_str("0x410fd0c0", "0x00000000410FD0C0")) >> + return -1; >> + /* r0p0 = r0p0 matches */ >> + if (strcmp_cpuid_str("0x00000000410fd480", "0x00000000410fd480")) >> + return -1; >> + /* r0p1 > r0p0 matches */ >> + if (strcmp_cpuid_str("0x00000000410fd480", "0x00000000410fd481")) >> + return -1; >> + /* r1p0 > r0p0 matches*/ >> + if (strcmp_cpuid_str("0x00000000410fd480", "0x00000000411fd480")) >> + return -1; >> + /* r0p0 < r0p1 doesn't match */ >> + if (!strcmp_cpuid_str("0x00000000410fd481", "0x00000000410fd480")) >> + return -1; >> + /* r0p0 < r1p0 doesn't match */ >> + if (!strcmp_cpuid_str("0x00000000411fd480", "0x00000000410fd480")) >> + return -1; >> + /* Different CPU doesn't match */ >> + if (!strcmp_cpuid_str("0x00000000410fd4c0", "0x00000000430f0af0")) >> + return -1; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> -- >> 2.34.1 >> > ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ git am ./v6_20230816_james_clark_perf_vendor_events_arm64_update_n2_and_v2_metrics_and_events_using_arm_telem.mbx > Applying: perf test: Add a test for the new Arm CPU ID comparison behavior > .git/rebase-apply/patch:93: new blank line at EOF. > + > warning: 1 line adds whitespace errors. > ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ > > I'm removing it
Interesting that checkpatch.pl doesn't see that. Thanks for the fix.
| |