Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] perf/smmuv3: Add platform id table for module auto loading | From | Yicong Yang <> | Date | Mon, 14 Aug 2023 16:51:49 +0800 |
| |
On 2023/8/12 13:31, Barry Song wrote: > On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 1:24 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 6:14 PM Yicong Yang <yangyicong@huawei.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 2023/8/9 20:11, Liang Li wrote: >>>> Hi Yicong, >>>> >>>> Thanks for your reply, >>>> >>>> On 2023-08-09 14:31, Yicong Yang <yangyicong@huawei.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi Barry, Liang, >>>>> >>>>> On 2023/8/9 13:47, Barry Song wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 1:01 PM Liang Li <liliang6@email.cn> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2023-08-07 20:22, Yicong Yang <yangyicong@huawei.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On ACPI based system the device is probed by the name directly. If the >>>>>>>> driver is configured as module it can only be loaded manually. Add the >>>>>>>> platform id table as well as the module alias then the driver will be >>>>>>>> loaded automatically by the udev or others once the device added. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please consider revise the long log to clearly express the purpose of the >>>>>>> changes in this patch: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - What's the exact issue the patch is addressing >>>>>>> - Why the changes in this patch can fix the issue or make something working >>>>>>> - Consider impact of the changes introduced by this patch >>>>>>> >>>>>>> These info may help reviewers and maintainers .. and yourself on code merge. >>>>>> >>>>>> years ago, i found a good doc regarding this, >>>>>> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Modalias >>>>>> >>>>>> guess it is because /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/modules.alias fails to contain smmu >>>>>> driver without the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE, isn't it, yicong? >>>>> >>>>> Yes I think it's the reason. I didn't find summary in kernel docs for the modalias >>>>> as well as the uevent mechanism. Arch wiki has a well illustration for the modalias >>>>> and suse[1] describes how this is used by the udev for module auto loading. >>>>> >>>>> For my case I'm using a ACPI based arm64 server and after booting the arm_smmuv3_pmu.ko >>>>> is not auto loaded by the udevd since we aren't providing this information. In order >>>>> to support this we need to provide this MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() when the smmu pmu added >>>>> as a platform device, then the userspace udev can know which module to load after the >>>>> device is added. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Then what's the purpose of the added '.id_table = ...' line in the previous >>>> patch ? >>>> <We lost the patch context in this thread.> >>>> >>>> Based on above clarification, the updated DEVICE_TABLE would update modalias >>>> as expected, right ? >>> >>> ok, it's lack of illustration in the commit. If we're going to use MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE we need >>> a platform id table. So I add it and I found it weired if we have a id table but not use it for >>> probing, so I also initialize .id_table. >>> >>> I found there's also an another way to implement this by used MODULE_ALIAS(), and no need to add >>> an id table. Maybe this way is less controversial. >> >> right, how is your driver matching with your device? >> >> acpi_driver_match_device() or strcmp(pdev->name, drv->name) == 0 ? >
The latter. The smmu pmu platform device is created when parsing the IORT so probed by matching the device and driver name directly.
> btw, those drivers supporting acpi probe usually have a acpi table > > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) > static const struct acpi_device_id hidma_acpi_ids[] = { > {"QCOM8061"}, > {"QCOM8062", HIDMA_MSI_CAP}, > {"QCOM8063", (HIDMA_MSI_CAP | HIDMA_IDENTITY_CAP)}, > {}, > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, hidma_acpi_ids); > #endif > >> >> static int platform_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv) >> { >> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); >> struct platform_driver *pdrv = to_platform_driver(drv); >> >> /* When driver_override is set, only bind to the matching driver */ >> if (pdev->driver_override) >> return !strcmp(pdev->driver_override, drv->name); >> >> /* Attempt an OF style match first */ >> if (of_driver_match_device(dev, drv)) >> return 1; >> >> /* Then try ACPI style match */ >> if (acpi_driver_match_device(dev, drv)) >> return 1; >> >> /* Then try to match against the id table */ >> if (pdrv->id_table) >> return platform_match_id(pdrv->id_table, pdev) != NULL; >> >> /* fall-back to driver name match */ >> return (strcmp(pdev->name, drv->name) == 0); >> } >> >> In both cases, it seems we don't need id_table. id_table can support >> two or above device names, so that one driver can support >> multiple device IDs usually with different specific device data. >>
yes I think you're right. For my case use MODULE_ALIAS is enough. Will respin a v2.
Thanks!
>>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c >>> index 25a269d431e4..4c32b6dbfe76 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c >>> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c >>> @@ -984,6 +984,7 @@ static void __exit arm_smmu_pmu_exit(void) >>> >>> module_exit(arm_smmu_pmu_exit); >>> >>> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:arm-smmu-v3-pmcg"); >>> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PMU driver for ARM SMMUv3 Performance Monitors Extension"); >>> MODULE_AUTHOR("Neil Leeder <nleeder@codeaurora.org>"); >>> MODULE_AUTHOR("Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>"); >>> >> >> Thanks >> Barry > . >
| |