Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 12 Aug 2023 14:20:19 +0900 | From | Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] tracing/eprobe: Iterate trace_eprobe directly |
| |
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 15:45:23 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 16:12:39 +0800 > Chuang Wang <nashuiliang@gmail.com> wrote: > > > + > > +#define for_each_trace_eprobe_on_trace_probe(ep, _tp) \ > > + list_for_each_entry(ep, trace_probe_probe_list(_tp), tp.list) > > + > > As I replied to the other patch, but after this one was sent (sorry, I was > hyperfocused on my work the last couple of days and was not reading email, > so my INBOX is a bit full). I really hate the verbosity of that name. > > At a minimum, let's call it: > > for_each_trace_point_eprobe()
OK, what about "for_each_trace_eprobe_on()"? I would like to clarify
- what type is returned - not all trace_eprobes, but only on the trace_probe.
Thank you,
> > -- Steve
-- Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
| |