Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Tue, 1 Aug 2023 15:04:07 +0300 | From | Matti Vaittinen <> | Subject | [PATCH v8 6/8] i2c: i2c-smbus: fwnode_irq_get_byname() return value fix |
| |
The fwnode_irq_get_byname() was changed to not return 0 upon failure so return value check can be adjusted to reflect the change.
Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
--- Revision history: v5 =>: - No changes v4 => v5: - Added back after this was accidentally dropped at v4.
The patch changing the fwnode_irq_get() got merged during 5.4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/fb7241d3-d1d1-1c37-919b-488d6d007484@gmail.com/ This is a clean-up as agreed.
The return value change did also cause a functional change here. Eg. when IRQ mapping fails, the fwnode_irq_get_byname() no longer returns zero. This will cause also the probe here to return nonzero failure. I guess this is desired behaviour - but I would appreciate any confirmation.
Please, see also previous discussion here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/fbd52f5f5253b382b8d7b3e8046134de29f965b8.1666710197.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com/
Another suggestion has been to drop the check altogether. I am slightly reluctant on doing that unless it gets confirmed that is the "right thing to do". --- drivers/i2c/i2c-smbus.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-smbus.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-smbus.c index 138c3f5e0093..893fe7cd3e41 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-smbus.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-smbus.c @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static int smbalert_probe(struct i2c_client *ara) } else { irq = fwnode_irq_get_byname(dev_fwnode(adapter->dev.parent), "smbus_alert"); - if (irq <= 0) + if (irq < 0) return irq; } -- 2.40.1
-- Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC Kiviharjunlenkki 1E 90220 OULU FINLAND
~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~ Simon says - in Latin please. ~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~ Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =] [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |