lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 11/36] arm64/mm: Map pages for guarded control stack
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 08:02:31PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 02:43:20PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > {
> > - pteval_t prot = pgprot_val(protection_map[vm_flags &
> > + pteval_t prot;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If this is a GCS then only interpret VM_WRITE.
> > + *
> > + * TODO: Just make protection_map[] bigger? Nothing seems
> > + * ideal here.
> > + */

> I think extending protection_map and updating adjust_protection_map() is
> cleaner and probably faster.

That was my initial thought but then I immediately started second
guessing myself about review comments. Hopefully Will or Catalin will
weigh in.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-08-01 21:06    [W:0.103 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site