lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/4] mm: mremap: use flush_pmd_tlb_range() in move_normal_pmd()
From


On 2023/7/31 19:05, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 03:48:27PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> Archs may need to do special things when flushing thp tlb,
>> so use the more applicable flush_pud_tlb_range() instead of
>> flush_tlb_range().
>>
>> Fixes: 2c91bd4a4e2e ("mm: speed up mremap by 20x on large regions")
>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> mm/mremap.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/mremap.c b/mm/mremap.c
>> index 11e06e4ab33b..1883205fa22b 100644
>> --- a/mm/mremap.c
>> +++ b/mm/mremap.c
>> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static bool move_normal_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long old_addr,
>> VM_BUG_ON(!pmd_none(*new_pmd));
>>
>> pmd_populate(mm, new_pmd, pmd_pgtable(pmd));
>> - flush_tlb_range(vma, old_addr, old_addr + PMD_SIZE);
>> + flush_pmd_tlb_range(vma, old_addr, old_addr + PMD_SIZE);
>
> I don't think that's correct for arm64. The assumption in the
> flush_p*d_tlb_range() was that they are called only for block mappings
> at that p*d level (and we use FEAT_TTL on arm64 indicating that the leaf
> level is level 2 for pmd, 1 for pud). IIUC move_normal_pmd() is only
> called for table pmds which would have a leaf level of 3 (the pte).

oops, yes, this is for NORMAL_PMD case, not HPAGE_PMD, please ignore
patch 2/3.

>
> Same for the next patch doing the equivalent for the pud.
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-07-31 13:20    [W:0.082 / U:0.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site