lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 02/14] futex: Extend the FUTEX2 flags
Date
On Fri, Jul 21 2023 at 12:22, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +#define FUTEX2_8 0x00
> +#define FUTEX2_16 0x01
> #define FUTEX2_32 0x02
> - /* 0x04 */
> +#define FUTEX2_64 0x03
> +#define FUTEX2_NUMA 0x04
> /* 0x08 */
> /* 0x10 */
> /* 0x20 */
> --- a/kernel/futex/syscalls.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex/syscalls.c
> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(futex, u32 __user *, uad
> return do_futex(uaddr, op, val, tp, uaddr2, (unsigned long)utime, val3);
> }
>
> -#define FUTEX2_MASK (FUTEX2_32 | FUTEX2_PRIVATE)
> +#define FUTEX2_MASK (FUTEX2_64 | FUTEX2_PRIVATE)
>
> /**
> * futex_parse_waitv - Parse a waitv array from userspace
> @@ -207,7 +207,12 @@ static int futex_parse_waitv(struct fute
> if ((aux.flags & ~FUTEX2_MASK) || aux.__reserved)
> return -EINVAL;

With the above aux.flags with FUTEX2_32 set will result in -EINVAL. I
don't think that's intentional.

Thanks,

tglx

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-07-31 18:12    [W:0.680 / U:1.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site