lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jul]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] hwrng: add Zhaoxin HW RNG driver
From


在 2023/7/26 20:13, Martin Kaiser 写道:
> Hi,
>
> some quick remarks. Feel free to correct me if I misunderstood
> something.
>
Thank you very much for your advice, I will fix them in the next version.

> LeoLiu-oc (LeoLiu-oc@zhaoxin.com) wrote:
>
>> From: leoliu-oc <leoliu-oc@zhaoxin.com>
>
>> Add support for Zhaoxin HW RNG.
>
>> Signed-off-by: leoliu-oc <leoliu-oc@zhaoxin.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/char/hw_random/Kconfig | 13 +++
>> drivers/char/hw_random/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/char/hw_random/via-rng.c | 17 ++--
>> drivers/char/hw_random/zhaoxin-rng.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/char/hw_random/zhaoxin-rng.c
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/Kconfig b/drivers/char/hw_random/Kconfig
>> index e0b3786ca51b..3b3c00e87b7b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/Kconfig
>> @@ -150,6 +150,19 @@ config HW_RANDOM_VIA
>
>> If unsure, say Y.
>
>> +config HW_RANDOM_ZHAOXIN
>> + tristate "Zhaoxin HW Random Number Generator support"
>> + depends on X86
>
> depends on X86 || COMPILE_TEST >
Thanks for your advice. I will add it in the next version.

>> + default HW_RANDOM
>> + help
>> + This driver provides kernel-side support for the Random Number
>> + Generator hardware found on Zhaoxin based motherboards.
>> +
>> + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
>> + module will be called zhaoxin-rng.
>> +
>> + If unsure, say Y.
>> +
>> config HW_RANDOM_IXP4XX
>> tristate "Intel IXP4xx NPU HW Pseudo-Random Number Generator support"
>> depends on ARCH_IXP4XX || COMPILE_TEST
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/Makefile b/drivers/char/hw_random/Makefile
>> index 32549a1186dc..ef5b3ae0794d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/Makefile
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_GEODE) += geode-rng.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_N2RNG) += n2-rng.o
>> n2-rng-y := n2-drv.o n2-asm.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_VIA) += via-rng.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_ZHAOXIN) += zhaoxin-rng.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_EXYNOS) += exynos-trng.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_IXP4XX) += ixp4xx-rng.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_OMAP) += omap-rng.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/via-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/via-rng.c
>> index a9a0a3b09c8b..33a6e2fdacd1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/via-rng.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/via-rng.c
>> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static int via_rng_init(struct hwrng *rng)
>> * is always enabled if CPUID rng_en is set. There is no
>> * RNG configuration like it used to be the case in this
>> * register */
>> - if (((c->x86 == 6) && (c->x86_model >= 0x0f)) || (c->x86 > 6)){
>> + if ((c->x86 == 6) && (c->x86_model >= 0x0f)) {
>> if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSTORE_EN)) {
>> pr_err(PFX "can't enable hardware RNG "
>> "if XSTORE is not enabled\n");
>> @@ -191,13 +191,20 @@ static struct hwrng via_rng = {
>> .data_read = via_rng_data_read,
>> };
>
>> +static const struct x86_cpu_id via_rng_cpu_ids[] = {
>> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_FEATURE(CENTAUR, 6, X86_FEATURE_XSTORE, NULL),
>> + {}
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, via_rng_cpu_ids);
>
>> static int __init via_rng_mod_init(void)
>> {
>> int err;
>
>> - if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSTORE))
>> + if (!x86_match_cpu(via_rng_cpu_ids)) {
>> + pr_err(PFX "The CPU isn't support XSTORE.\n");
>
> doesn't support
>
> Generally: Should we print an error message if our driver doesn't
> support this cpu? It seems that most other callers of x86_match_cpu
> simply return without an error message.
>Agree with you. I will remove it in the next version.

>> return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>
>> pr_info("VIA RNG detected\n");
>> err = hwrng_register(&via_rng);
>> @@ -217,11 +224,5 @@ static void __exit via_rng_mod_exit(void)
>> }
>> module_exit(via_rng_mod_exit);
>
>> -static struct x86_cpu_id __maybe_unused via_rng_cpu_id[] = {
>> - X86_MATCH_FEATURE(X86_FEATURE_XSTORE, NULL),
>> - {}
>> -};
>> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, via_rng_cpu_id);
>> -
>> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("H/W RNG driver for VIA CPU with PadLock");
>> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/zhaoxin-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/zhaoxin-rng.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..2e657b227c5b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/zhaoxin-rng.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>> +/*
>> + * RNG driver for Zhaoxin RNGs
>> + *
>> + * Copyright 2005 (c) MontaVista Software, Inc.
>
> Should this be Copyright 2023 by you? >
OK, I will add Copyright information correctly in the next version.

>> + *
>> + * with the majority of the code coming from:
>> + *
>> + * Hardware driver for the Intel/AMD/VIA Random Number Generators (RNG)
>> + * (c) Copyright 2003 Red Hat Inc <jgarzik@redhat.com>
>> + *
>> + * derived from
>> + *
>> + * Hardware driver for the AMD 768 Random Number Generator (RNG)
>> + * (c) Copyright 2001 Red Hat Inc
>> + *
>> + * derived from
>> + *
>> + * Hardware driver for Intel i810 Random Number Generator (RNG)
>> + * Copyright 2000,2001 Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
>> + * Copyright 2000,2001 Philipp Rumpf <prumpf@mandrakesoft.com>
>> + *
>> + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
>> + * License version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any
>> + * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <crypto/padlock.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/hw_random.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/cpufeature.h>
>> +#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
>> +#include <asm/fpu/api.h>
>> +
>> +enum {
>> + ZHAOXIN_RNG_CHUNK_8 = 0x00, /* 64 rand bits, 64 stored bits*/
>> + ZHAOXIN_RNG_CHUNK_4 = 0x01, /* 32 rand bits, 32 stored bits */
>> + ZHAOXIN_RNG_CHUNK_2 = 0x02, /* 16 rand bits, 32 stored bits */
>> + ZHAOXIN_RNG_CHUNK_1 = 0x03, /* 8 rand bits, 32 stored bits */
>> + ZHAOXIN_RNG_MAX_SIZE = (128*1024),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int zhaoxin_rng_init(struct hwrng *rng)
>> +{
>> + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSTORE_EN)) {
>> + pr_err(PFX "can't enable hardware RNG if XSTORE is not enabled\n");
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>
> Can't we check this when the driver is loaded? (This init function here
> is called when the rng becomes active.) >
The XSTORE feature has two related macro definitions,X86_FEATURE_XSTORE
and X86_FEATURE_XSTORE_EN.Indicates that the XSTORE feature is present
and enabled,respectively. X86_FEATURE_XSTORE has been checked when the
driver is loaded. X86_FEATURE_XSTORE_EN is placed in the init function
to check whether it is enabled.

This is also a reference to other driver, such as via-rng.c.

>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int rep_xstore(size_t size, size_t factor, void *result)
>> +{
>> + __asm__ __volatile__ (
>> + "movq %0, %%rcx\n"
>> + "movq %1, %%rdx\n"
>> + "movq %2, %%rdi\n"
>> + ".byte 0xf3, 0x0f, 0xa7, 0xc0"
>> + :
>> + : "r"(size), "r"(factor), "r"(result)
>> + : "%rcx", "%rdx", "%rdi", "memory");
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int zhaoxin_rng_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *data, size_t max, bool wait)
>> +{
>> + if (max > ZHAOXIN_RNG_MAX_SIZE)
>> + max = ZHAOXIN_RNG_MAX_SIZE;
>> + rep_xstore(max, ZHAOXIN_RNG_CHUNK_1, data);
>> + return max;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct hwrng zhaoxin_rng = {
>> + .name = "zhaoxin",
>> + .init = zhaoxin_rng_init,
>> + .read = zhaoxin_rng_read,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct x86_cpu_id zhaoxin_rng_cpu_ids[] = {
>> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_FEATURE(ZHAOXIN, 6, X86_FEATURE_XSTORE, NULL),
>> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_FEATURE(ZHAOXIN, 7, X86_FEATURE_XSTORE, NULL),
>> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_FEATURE(CENTAUR, 7, X86_FEATURE_XSTORE, NULL),
>> + {}
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, zhaoxin_rng_cpu_ids);
>> +
>> +static int __init zhaoxin_rng_mod_init(void)
>> +{
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + if (!x86_match_cpu(zhaoxin_rng_cpu_ids)) {
>> + pr_err(PFX "The CPU isn't support XSTORE.\n");
>
> Yet again, is this really an error?
>
Yes, as discussed above. I will fix it in the next version.

>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pr_info("Zhaoxin RNG detected\n");
>> + err = hwrng_register(&zhaoxin_rng);
>> + if (err)
>> + pr_err(PFX "RNG registering failed (%d)\n", err);
>> +
>> + return err;
>> +}
>> +module_init(zhaoxin_rng_mod_init);
>> +
>> +static void __exit zhaoxin_rng_mod_exit(void)
>> +{
>> + hwrng_unregister(&zhaoxin_rng);
>> +}
>> +module_exit(zhaoxin_rng_mod_exit);
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("H/W RNG driver for Zhaoxin CPU");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("YunShen@zhaoxin.com");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>
> Best regards,
> Martin

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-07-31 05:05    [W:0.165 / U:0.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site