lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jul]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] dmaengine: plx_dma: Fix potential deadlock on &plxdev->ring_lock


On 7/29/23 11:59, Chengfeng Ye wrote:
> As plx_dma_process_desc() is invoked by both tasklet plx_dma_desc_task()
> under softirq context and plx_dma_tx_status() callback that executed under
> process context, the lock aquicision of &plxdev->ring_lock inside
> plx_dma_process_desc() should disable irq otherwise deadlock could happen
> if the irq preempts the execution of process context code while the lock
> is held in process context on the same CPU.
>
> Possible deadlock scenario:
> plx_dma_tx_status()
> -> plx_dma_process_desc()
> -> spin_lock(&plxdev->ring_lock)
> <tasklet softirq>
> -> plx_dma_desc_task()
> -> plx_dma_process_desc()
> -> spin_lock(&plxdev->ring_lock) (deadlock here)
>
> This flaw was found by an experimental static analysis tool I am developing
> for irq-related deadlock.
>
> The lock was changed from spin_lock_bh() to spin_lock() by a previous patch
> for performance concern but unintentionally brought this potential deadlock
> problem.
>
> This patch reverts back to spin_lock_bh() to fix the deadlock problem.
>
> Fixes: 1d05a0bdb420 ("dmaengine: plx_dma: Move spin_lock_bh() to spin_lock()")
> Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com>
>

Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>

Thanks!

Logan

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-07-31 01:52    [W:0.112 / U:1.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site