Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 30 Jul 2023 20:04:03 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] firmware: qcom_scm: Add support for Qualcomm Secure Execution Environment SCM interface | From | Maximilian Luz <> |
| |
On 7/30/23 18:19, Maximilian Luz wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h b/include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h > index 250ea4efb7cb..dd4236cffbec 100644 > --- a/include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h > +++ b/include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h > @@ -122,4 +122,25 @@ extern int qcom_scm_lmh_dcvsh(u32 payload_fn, u32 payload_reg, u32 payload_val, > extern int qcom_scm_lmh_profile_change(u32 profile_id); > extern bool qcom_scm_lmh_dcvsh_available(void); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_QCOM_QSEECOM > + > +int qcom_scm_qseecom_app_get_id(const char *app_name, u32 *app_id); > +int qcom_scm_qseecom_app_send(u32 app_id, void *req, size_t req_size, void *rsp, > + size_t rsp_size); > + > +#else /* CONFIG_QCOM_QSEECOM */ > + > +int qcom_scm_qseecom_app_get_id(const char *app_name, u32 *app_id) > +{ > + return -EINVAL; > +} > + > +int qcom_scm_qseecom_app_send(u32 app_id, void *req, size_t req_size, void *rsp, > + size_t rsp_size) > +{ > + return -EINVAL; > +}
As the kernel test robot rightfully complained: I forgot to static inline both functions above. Already fixed for v6.
Regards Max
| |