Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 3 Jul 2023 21:07:15 +0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH -next v6 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv | From | "chenjiahao (C)" <> |
| |
On 2023/7/1 21:45, Guo Ren wrote: > On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 5:12 PM Chen Jiahao <chenjiahao16@huawei.com> wrote: >> On riscv, the current crash kernel allocation logic is trying to >> allocate within 32bit addressible memory region by default, if >> failed, try to allocate without 4G restriction. >> >> In need of saving DMA zone memory while allocating a relatively large >> crash kernel region, allocating the reserved memory top down in >> high memory, without overlapping the DMA zone, is a mature solution. >> Hence this patchset introduces the parameter option crashkernel=X,[high,low]. >> >> One can reserve the crash kernel from high memory above DMA zone range >> by explicitly passing "crashkernel=X,high"; or reserve a memory range >> below 4G with "crashkernel=X,low". Besides, there are few rules need >> to take notice: >> 1. "crashkernel=X,[high,low]" will be ignored if "crashkernel=size" >> is specified. >> 2. "crashkernel=X,low" is valid only when "crashkernel=X,high" is passed >> and there is enough memory to be allocated under 4G. >> 3. When allocating crashkernel above 4G and no "crashkernel=X,low" is >> specified, a 128M low memory will be allocated automatically for >> swiotlb bounce buffer. >> See Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt for more information. >> >> To verify loading the crashkernel, adapted kexec-tools is attached below: >> https://github.com/chenjh005/kexec-tools/tree/build-test-riscv-v2 >> >> Following test cases have been performed as expected: >> 1) crashkernel=256M //low=256M >> 2) crashkernel=1G //low=1G > Have you tried 1GB memory? we found a pud mapping problem on Sv39 of kexec, See: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230629082032.3481237-1-guoren@kernel.org/
I have tested on QEMU with sv57 mmu, so it seems the synchronization problem was not reproduce when reserving 1G memory and loading the capture kernel.
Thanks, Jiahao
> >> 3) crashkernel=4G //high=4G, low=128M(default) >> 4) crashkernel=4G crashkernel=256M,high //high=4G, low=128M(default), high is ignored >> 5) crashkernel=4G crashkernel=256M,low //high=4G, low=128M(default), low is ignored >> 6) crashkernel=4G,high //high=4G, low=128M(default) >> 7) crashkernel=256M,low //low=0M, invalid >> 8) crashkernel=4G,high crashkernel=256M,low //high=4G, low=256M >> 9) crashkernel=4G,high crashkernel=4G,low //high=0M, low=0M, invalid >> 10) crashkernel=512M@0xd0000000 //low=512M >> >> Changes since [v6]: >> 1. Introduce the "high" flag to mark whether "crashkernel=X,high" >> is passed. Fix the retrying logic between "crashkernel=X,high" >> case and others when the first allocation attempt fails. >> >> Changes since [v5]: >> 1. Update the crashkernel allocation logic when crashkernel=X,high >> is specified. In this case, region above 4G will directly get >> reserved as crashkernel, rather than trying lower 32bit allocation >> first. >> >> Changes since [v4]: >> 1. Update some imprecise code comments for cmdline parsing. >> >> Changes since [v3]: >> 1. Update to print warning and return explicitly on failure when >> crashkernel=size@offset is specified. Not changing the result >> in this case but making the logic more straightforward. >> 2. Some minor cleanup. >> >> Changes since [v2]: >> 1. Update the allocation logic to ensure the high crashkernel >> region is reserved strictly above dma32_phys_limit. >> 2. Clean up some minor format problems. >> >> Chen Jiahao (2): >> riscv: kdump: Implement crashkernel=X,[high,low] >> docs: kdump: Update the crashkernel description for riscv >> >> .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 15 ++-- >> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 5 ++ >> arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++-- >> 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.34.1 >> >
| |