| Date | Fri, 28 Jul 2023 19:30:57 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 12/33] iris: vidc: add helper functions for resource management | From | Konrad Dybcio <> |
| |
On 28.07.2023 15:23, Vikash Garodia wrote: > From: Dikshita Agarwal <quic_dikshita@quicinc.com> > > This implements ops to initialize, enable and disable extrenal > resources needed by video driver like power domains, clocks etc. > > Signed-off-by: Dikshita Agarwal <quic_dikshita@quicinc.com> > Signed-off-by: Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@quicinc.com> > --- There's a whole bunch of kerneldoc abuses (comments should start with /* and not /**). Make sure you have proper spaces between single-line C-style comments (e.g. /*Get should be /* Get etc.)
Capitalizing the first word within the comment would be nice too.
Do we need a separate bus table? i.e. does it make sense to adjust the bandwidth values separately from the clock rates?
Do you think there will be more than one set of msm_vidc_resources_ops? Perhaps it'd make sense to drop that layer of abstraction if not. Many function names could drop the __ prefix.
A whole bunch of d_vpr_h seem almost excessive.
MSM_VIDC_CLKFLAG_* are unused.
Konrad
|