lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] percpu: some trivial cleanup patches
On 07/27/23 at 03:50pm, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 11:30:14AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 07/21/23 at 02:04pm, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 09:17:57PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > > There's a left issue in my mailbox about percpu code at below. When
> > > > I rechecked it and considered Dennis's comment, I made an attmept
> > > > to fix it with patch 3.
> > > >
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y407wDMKq5ibE9sc@fedora/T/#u
> > > >
> > > > Patch 1 and 2 are trivial clean up patches when reading percpu code.
> > > >
> > > > Baoquan He (3):
> > > > mm/percpu.c: remove redundant check
> > > > mm/percpu.c: optimize the code in pcpu_setup_first_chunk() a little
> > > > bit
> > > > mm/percpu.c: print error message too if atomic alloc failed
> > > >
> > > > mm/percpu.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.34.1
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for these. I left a few comments. I think I might have some stuff
> > > for v6.6, I'll figure that out in a couple days. If that's so, I can
> > > pull 1, probably massage 2 and send that out again, and then I think
> > > you'll need to resend 3.
> >
> > Sure, thanks for careful reviewing and great suggestion. So I only need
> > to send v2 of patch 3, right? Or I should change and send v2 of the
> > whold series? I may not get it clear.
> >
>
> Sorry for the delay. I've pulled 1 and 2 (reworded the comment). Can you
> please resend patch 3.

Sent out v2 of patch 3, thanks.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-07-28 05:06    [W:0.068 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site