lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86: check the kvm_cpu_get_interrupt result before using it
Date
The code was blindly assuming that kvm_cpu_get_interrupt never returns -1
when there is a pending interrupt.

While this should be true, a bug in KVM can still cause this.

If -1 is returned, the code before this patch was converting it to 0xFF,
and 0xFF interrupt was injected to the guest, which results in an issue
which was hard to debug.

Add WARN_ON_ONCE to catch this case and skip the injection
if this happens again.

Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index a6b9bea62fb8ac..00b87fcf6da4af 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -10203,9 +10203,13 @@ static int kvm_check_and_inject_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (r < 0)
goto out;
if (r) {
- kvm_queue_interrupt(vcpu, kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(vcpu), false);
- static_call(kvm_x86_inject_irq)(vcpu, false);
- WARN_ON(static_call(kvm_x86_interrupt_allowed)(vcpu, true) < 0);
+ int irq = kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(vcpu);
+
+ if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(irq == -1)) {
+ kvm_queue_interrupt(vcpu, irq, false);
+ static_call(kvm_x86_inject_irq)(vcpu, false);
+ WARN_ON(static_call(kvm_x86_interrupt_allowed)(vcpu, true) < 0);
+ }
}
if (kvm_cpu_has_injectable_intr(vcpu))
static_call(kvm_x86_enable_irq_window)(vcpu);
--
2.26.3
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-07-26 16:03    [W:0.035 / U:1.952 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site